ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023
Prognostic Prediction of Cancer Based on Radiomics Features of Diagnostic Imaging: The Performance of Machine Learning Strategies.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for Radiomics in Oncology: Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A framework for a national cancer imaging repository in Nigeria.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting Immunotherapy Outcomes in NSCLC Using RNA and Pathology from Multicenter Clinical Trials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a CT-based comprehensive nomogram for differentiating benign from malignant subcentimeter solid nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- CT-based radiomics model for noninvasive prediction of progression-free survival in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: a multicenter study incorporating preoperative and postoperative clinical factors.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Machine learning in image-based outcome prediction after radiotherapy: A review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Review
- Radiomics approach for identifying radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity in the lung.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting Breast Cancer Risk Using Radiomics Features of Mammography Images.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The artificial intelligence and machine learning in lung cancer immunotherapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- Predictive modeling of perioperative blood transfusion in lumbar posterior interbody fusion using machine learning.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Identification of a prognostic biomarker predicting biochemical recurrence and construction of a novel nomogram for prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor phenotypes can be characterized by radiomics features extracted from images. However, the prediction accuracy is challenged by difficulties such as small sample size and data imbalance. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of machine learning strategies for the prediction of cancer prognosis. A total of 422 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) were selected from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). The gross tumor volume (GTV) of each case was delineated from the respective CT images for radiomic features extraction. The samples were divided into 4 groups with survival endpoints of 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 7 years. The radiomic image features were analyzed with 6 different machine learning methods: decision tree (DT), boosted tree (BT), random forests (RF), support vector machine (SVM), generalized linear model (GLM), and deep learning artificial neural networks (DL-ANNs) with 70:30 cross-validation. The overall average prediction performance of the BT, RF, DT, SVM, GLM and DL-ANNs was AUC with 0.912, 0.938, 0.793, 0.746, 0.789 and 0.705 respectively. The RF and BT gave the best and second performance in the prediction. The DL-ANN did not show obvious advantage in predicting prognostic outcomes. Deep learning artificial neural networks did not show a significant improvement than traditional machine learning methods such as random forest and boosted trees. On the whole, the accurate outcome prediction using radiomics serves as a supportive reference for formulating treatment strategy for cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.