Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781558›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Feasibility of an embedded palliative care clinic model for patients with an advanced thoracic malignancy.

Erin M Bertino, Madison M Grogan, Jason A Benedict, Julia L Agne, Sarah Janse, Christine Eastep, Diana Sullivan, Kelly C Gast, Michelle J Naughton, Carolyn J Presley

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of early palliative care integration on patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin M BertinoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Madison M GroganDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jason A BenedictCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Julia L AgneDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sarah JanseCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Christine EastepDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Diana SullivanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kelly C GastDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Michelle J NaughtonCancer Prevention and Control, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Carolyn J PresleyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. carolyn.presley@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly palliative care (PC) with standard oncology care has demonstrated improved patient outcomes, but multiple care delivery models are utilized. This study prospectively evaluated the feasibility of an embedded PC clinic model and collected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and caregiver needs.

methodsIn this observational study of embedded outpatient PC for patients with advanced thoracic malignancies treated at The Ohio State University Thoracic Oncology clinic, patients received same-day coordinated oncology and palliative care visits at one clinic location. PC encounters included comprehensive symptom assessment and management, advanced care planning, and goals of care discussion. Multiple study assessments were utilized. We describe the feasibility of evaluating PROs and caregiver needs in an embedded PC model.

resultsForty patients and 28 caregivers were enrolled. PROs were collected at baseline and follow-up visits. Over a 12-month follow-up, 36 patients discontinued study participation due to hospice enrollment, death, study withdrawal, or COVID restrictions. At baseline, 32 patients (80%) rated distress as moderate-severe with clinically significant depression (44%) and anxiety (36%). Survey completion rates significantly decreased over time: 3 months (24 eligible, 66% completed), 6 months (17 eligible; 41% completed), 9 months (9 eligible; 44% completed), and 12 months (4 eligible; 50% completed).

conclusionWe found that an embedded PC clinic was feasible, although there were challenges encountered in longitudinal collection of PROs due to high study attrition. Ongoing assessment and expansion of this embedded PC model will continue to identify strengths and challenges to improve patient and caregiver outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Thoracic NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesHumansOutpatientsPalliative CareEmbedded clinicFeasibilityOncology clinicPalliative careThoracic malignancy

Identifiers

PMID36781558
PMCPMC9925518
OpenAlexW4320710551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.