SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2023
Radiographic measurements for the prediction of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The use of hybrid operating rooms in neurosurgery, advantages, disadvantages, and future perspectives: a systematic review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Pooled it
- Automated Measurement of Occipito-Axial Angle on Cervical Radiographs Using a Deep Learning Object Detection Model: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Neurospine · 2026Article
- The Risk of Dysphagia After Short-Segment Posterior Occipital-C2 Fusion versus C1-C2 Cervical Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.World neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Article
- The Halo Vest Immobilization for Craniocervical Junction Tuberculosis: A Comparison of Treatment Options.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Hypoglossal Nerve Palsy Following Cervical Spine Surgery-Two Case Reports and a Systematic Review of the Literature.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Risk factors and prognosis analysis of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion surgery: a retrospective study of 43 cases.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Epidemiology, tumour characteristics, treatment and outcomes associated with spinal nerve sheath tumours: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Optical Methods for Brain Tumor Detection: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Dysphagia, health-related quality of life, and return to work after occipitocervical fixation.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOccipitocervical fusion (OCF) is a procedure performed for multiple upper cervical pathologies. A common postprocedural complication of OCF is dysphagia, which has been linked to the narrowing of the pharyngeal space due to fixation in a hyper-flexed angle. Postoperative dysphagia is linked to reduced quality of life, prolonged hospital stay, aspiration pneumonia, and increased mortality. This has led to investigations of the association between sagittal radiographic angles and dysphagia following OCF.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed to explore the current evidence regarding cervical sagittal radiographic measurements and dysphagia following OCF. A search strategy was carried out using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from their dates of inception until August 2022. Only original English-language studies were considered. Moreover, studies had to include the correlation between dysphagia and at least one radiographic measurement in the sagittal plane.
resultsThe search and subsequent selection process yielded eight studies that were included in the final review, totaling 329 patients in whom dysphagia had been assessed and graded. The dysphagia score by Bazaz et al. (Spine 27, 22:2453-2458, 2002) was used most often. The pooled incidence of dysphagia, in the early postoperative period, was estimated at 26.4%. At long-term follow-up (range: 17-72 months), about one-third of patients experienced resolution of symptoms, which resulted in a long-term post-OCF dysphagia incidence of 16.5%. Across the studies included, six different radiographic parameters were used to derive several measures which were repeatedly and significantly associated with the occurrence of dysphagia.
conclusionsThe high incidence of postoperative dysphagia following OCF warrants close monitoring of patients, especially in the short-term postoperative period. These patients may be assessed through standardized tools where the one by Bazaz et al. was the most commonly used. Moreover, there are several radiographic measurements that can be used to predict the occurrence of dysphagia. These findings may serve as a basis for strategies to prevent the occurrence of dysphagia after OCF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.