Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36781217›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reviews2023

Sex/Gender Differences in the Time-Course for the Development of Substance Use Disorder: A Focus on the Telescoping Effect.

Eleanor Blair Towers, Ivy L Williams, Emaan I Qillawala, Emilie F Rissman, Wendy J Lynch

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor Blair TowersPsychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (E.B.T., I.L.W., E.I.Q., W.J.L.) and Medical Scientist Training Program (E.B.T.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, and Center for Human Health and the Environment and Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina (E.F.R.).
Ivy L WilliamsPsychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (E.B.T., I.L.W., E.I.Q., W.J.L.) and Medical Scientist Training Program (E.B.T.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, and Center for Human Health and the Environment and Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina (E.F.R.).
Emaan I QillawalaPsychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (E.B.T., I.L.W., E.I.Q., W.J.L.) and Medical Scientist Training Program (E.B.T.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, and Center for Human Health and the Environment and Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina (E.F.R.).
Emilie F RissmanPsychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (E.B.T., I.L.W., E.I.Q., W.J.L.) and Medical Scientist Training Program (E.B.T.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, and Center for Human Health and the Environment and Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina (E.F.R.).
Wendy J LynchPsychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences (E.B.T., I.L.W., E.I.Q., W.J.L.) and Medical Scientist Training Program (E.B.T.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, and Center for Human Health and the Environment and Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina (E.F.R.) wlynch@virginia.edu.
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007267 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI GARCIA-BLANCO, MARIANO A. · 1985 to 2024
$13.4M
TRAINING IN THE PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32GM007055 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI LYNCH, KEVIN R. · 1985 to 2022
$7.2M
Dopaminergic and Glutamatergic Mechanisms of Cocaine Addiction: Sex DifferencesR01DA024716 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Wendy Jean Lynch · 2008 to 2026
$6.1M
An investigation of low-intensity focused ultrasound for addictionR01DA052893 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Wendy Jean Lynch, B. JILL VENTON · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Genetic and hormonal contributions to sex differences in vulnerability to drug useR01DA048638 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LYNCH, WENDY JEAN, RISSMAN, EMILIE F. · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Preclinical assessment of kratom as an intervention for opioid use disorderR21DA049992 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LYNCH, WENDY JEAN · 2020 to 2021
$453k
Sex Differences in a Rat Model of Opioid Use disorderF30DA057808 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI TOWERS, ELEANOR · 2023 to 2024
$81k
NIDA NIH HHS F30 DA057808NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024716NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048638NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052893NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA049992NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007055NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex/gender effects have been demonstrated for multiple aspects of addiction, with one of the most commonly cited examples being the "telescoping effect" where women meet criteria and/or seek treatment of substance use disorder (SUD) after fewer years of drug use as compared with men. This phenomenon has been reported for multiple drug classes including opioids, psychostimulants, alcohol, and cannabis, as well as nonpharmacological addictions, such as gambling. However, there are some inconsistent reports that show either no difference between men and women or opposite effects and a faster course to addiction in men than women. Thus, the goals of this review are to evaluate evidence for and against the telescoping effect in women and to determine the conditions/populations for which the telescoping effect is most relevant. We also discuss evidence from preclinical studies, which strongly support the validity of the telescoping effect and show that female animals develop addiction-like features (e.g., compulsive drug use, an enhanced motivation for the drug, and enhanced drug-craving/vulnerability to relapse) more readily than male animals. We also discuss biologic factors that may contribute to the telescoping effect, such as ovarian hormones, and its neurobiological basis focusing on the mesolimbic dopamine reward pathway and the corticomesolimbic glutamatergic pathway considering the critical roles these pathways play in the rewarding/reinforcing effects of addictive drugs and SUD. We conclude with future research directions, including intervention strategies to prevent the development of SUD in women. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: One of the most widely cited gender/sex differences in substance use disorder (SUD) is the "telescoping effect," which reflects an accelerated course in women versus men for the development and/or seeking treatment for SUD. This review evaluates evidence for and against a telescoping effect drawing upon data from both clinical and preclinical studies. We also discuss the contribution of biological factors and underlying neurobiological mechanisms and highlight potential targets to prevent the development of SUD in women.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveGamblingSubstance-Related DisordersAnimalsFemaleMaleRewardSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID36781217
PMCPMC9969523
OpenAlexW4311193167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.