Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780766›Full record

ArticleLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023

Characterization of Central Nervous System Clinico-Genomic Outcomes in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Alectinib.

Emily Miao, Jordan E Eichholz, Emily S Lebow, Jessica Flynn, Zhigang Zhang, Henry Walch, Harper Hubbeling, Kathryn Beal, Nelson S Moss, Kenny K Yu and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The role of SMARCA4 in lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2025
    Review
  6. [Research Progress on SMARCA4 Mutation Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024
    Review
  7. A Critical Review of the Impact ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily MiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
Jordan E EichholzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States; Biomarker Development Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Emily S LebowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Jessica FlynnDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Zhigang ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Henry WalchMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Harper HubbelingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Kathryn BealDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Nelson S MossMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Kenny K YuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Alicia MengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Daniel W KellyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Daniel R GomezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States; Biomarker Development Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Bob T LiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States; Biomarker Development Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Andreas RimnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States; Biomarker Development Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Nikolaus SchultzMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Alexander DrilonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Brandon S ImberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States.
Luke R G PikeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States; Biomarker Development Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States. Electronic address: Pikel@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHighly effective brain-penetrant ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed for the management of NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM). Local therapy (LT) such as SRS or therapeutic craniotomy is increasingly being deferred for such patients. Herein we report detailed patient- and lesion-level intracranial outcomes and co-mutational genomic profiles from a cohort of NSCLC patients with BM treated with alectinib, with or without LT.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed ALK fusion-positive NSCLC patients with BMs who received alectinib at the diagnosis of BM from 1/2012 and 5/2021. Outcome variables included intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), overall survival (OS), duration of TKI therapy, and CNS response rates. Genomic characteristics from tumor specimens were assessed with MSK-IMPACT, a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genomic profiling assay.

resultsA total of 38 patients with 114 CNS lesions were included. Twelve of these patients also received contemporaneous LT (SRS, WBRT, or surgical resection). Maximal BM diameter in the TKI + LT group was greater (p < 0.003) but despite this difference, iPFS (TKI only, HR 1.21, 95 % CI 0.51-2.89; p = 0.66) and OS (TKI only, HR 5.99, 95 % CI 0.77-46.6; p = 0.052) were similar between groups and trended towards more favorable outcomes with the addition of LT. SMARCA4 co-alterations were associated with inferior OS (HR 8.76, 1.74-44.2; p = 0.009).

conclusionsOur study demonstrated that patients with ALK fusion-positive NSCLC treated with TKI + LT had larger BM and higher likelihood of pre-treatment neurologic symptoms. Despite these differences, iPFS was similar between groups. Results should be interpreted with caution as our study was limited by an underpowered sample size. SMARCA4 co-alterations were associated with inferior OS and these findings warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCarbazolesCentral Nervous SystemDNA HelicasesGenomicsHumansNuclear ProteinsPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesTranscription FactorsalectinibAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCarbazolesDNA HelicasesNuclear ProteinsPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsSMARCA4 protein, humanTranscription FactorsALKBrain MetastasesCentral Nervous SystemCNS RadiationNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Identifiers

PMID36780766
PMCPMC10065905
OpenAlexW4319764638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.