ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
Modeling the three-dimensional connectivity of in vitro cortical ensembles coupled to Micro-Electrode Arrays.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical Afferent Connectivity Drives Population-Wide Bursting Dynamics in a Computational Model of Human-Derived Excitatory Neuronal Networks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- WhenAPL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Digitoids: a novel computational platform for mimicking oxygen-dependent firing of neuronsFrontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Article
- Electrophysiological features of cortical 3D networks are deeply modulated by scaffold properties.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, in vitro three-dimensional (3D) neuronal networks are becoming a consolidated experimental model to overcome most of the intrinsic limitations of bi-dimensional (2D) assemblies. In the 3D environment, experimental evidence revealed a wider repertoire of activity patterns, characterized by a modulation of the bursting features, than the one observed in 2D cultures. However, it is not totally clear and understood what pushes the neuronal networks towards different dynamical regimes. One possible explanation could be the underlying connectivity, which could involve a larger number of neurons in a 3D rather than a 2D space and could organize following well-defined topological schemes. Driven by experimental findings, achieved by recording 3D cortical networks organized in multi-layered structures coupled to Micro-Electrode Arrays (MEAs), in the present work we developed a large-scale computational network model made up of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons to investigate possible structural configurations able to sustain the emerging patterns of electrophysiological activity. In particular, we investigated the role of the number of layers defining a 3D assembly and the spatial distribution of the connections within and among the layers. These configurations give rise to different patterns of activity that could be compared to the ones emerging from real in vitro 3D neuronal populations. Our results suggest that the introduction of three-dimensionality induced a global reduction in both firing and bursting rates with respect to 2D models. In addition, we found that there is a minimum number of layers necessary to obtain a change in the dynamics of the network. However, the effects produced by a 3D organization of the cells is somewhat mitigated if a scale-free connectivity is implemented in either one or all the layers of the network. Finally, the best matching of the experimental data is achieved supposing a 3D connectivity organized in structured bundles of links located in different areas of the 2D network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.