Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780507›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Gamma oscillations point to the role of primary visual cortex in atypical motion processing in autism.

Elena V Orekhova, Viktoriya O Manyukhina, Ilia A Galuta, Andrey O Prokofyev, Dzerassa E Goiaeva, Tatiana S Obukhova, Kirill A Fadeev, Justin F Schneiderman, Tatiana A Stroganova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena V OrekhovaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-0950-1613
Viktoriya O ManyukhinaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ilia A GalutaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-1753-4207
Andrey O ProkofyevCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Dzerassa E GoiaevaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Tatiana S ObukhovaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Kirill A FadeevCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Justin F SchneidermanMedTech West and the Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, The University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tatiana A StroganovaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Moscow State University of Psychology & Education · RUNational Research University Higher School of Economics · RUUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurophysiological studies suggest that abnormal neural inhibition may explain a range of sensory processing differences in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In particular, the impaired ability of people with ASD to visually discriminate the motion direction of small-size objects and their reduced perceptual suppression of background-like visual motion may stem from deficient surround inhibition within the primary visual cortex (V1) and/or its atypical top-down modulation by higher-tier cortical areas. In this study, we estimate the contribution of abnormal surround inhibition to the motion-processing deficit in ASD. For this purpose, we used a putative correlate of surround inhibition-suppression of the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) gamma response (GR) caused by an increase in the drift rate of a large annular high-contrast grating. The motion direction discrimination thresholds for the gratings of different angular sizes (1° and 12°) were assessed in a separate psychophysical paradigm. The MEG data were collected in 42 boys with ASD and 37 typically developing (TD) boys aged 7-15 years. Psychophysical data were available in 33 and 34 of these participants, respectively. The results showed that the GR suppression in V1 was reduced in boys with ASD, while their ability to detect the direction of motion was compromised only in the case of small stimuli. In TD boys, the GR suppression directly correlated with perceptual suppression caused by increasing stimulus size, thus suggesting the role of the top-down modulations of V1 in surround inhibition. In ASD, weaker GR suppression was associated with the poor directional sensitivity to small stimuli, but not with perceptual suppression. These results strongly suggest that a local inhibitory deficit in V1 plays an important role in the reduction of directional sensitivity in ASD and that this perceptual deficit cannot be explained exclusively by atypical top-down modulation of V1 by higher-tier cortical areas.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderMotion PerceptionHumansMagnetoencephalographyMalePhotic StimulationPrimary Visual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID36780507
PMCPMC9925089
OpenAlexW4320483713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.