Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780440›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Detection and measurement of butterfly eyespot and spot patterns using convolutional neural networks.

Carolina Cunha, Hemaxi Narotamo, Antónia Monteiro, Margarida Silveira

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carolina CunhaInstitute for Systems and Robotics (ISR), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Hemaxi NarotamoInstitute for Systems and Robotics (ISR), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1933-4273
Antónia MonteiroBiological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Margarida SilveiraInstitute for Systems and Robotics (ISR), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7777-3675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Butterflies are increasingly becoming model insects where basic questions surrounding the diversity of their color patterns are being investigated. Some of these color patterns consist of simple spots and eyespots. To accelerate the pace of research surrounding these discrete and circular pattern elements we trained distinct convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for detection and measurement of butterfly spots and eyespots on digital images of butterfly wings. We compared the automatically detected and segmented spot/eyespot areas with those manually annotated. These methods were able to identify and distinguish marginal eyespots from spots, as well as distinguish these patterns from less symmetrical patches of color. In addition, the measurements of an eyespot's central area and surrounding rings were comparable with the manual measurements. These CNNs offer improvements of eyespot/spot detection and measurements relative to previous methods because it is not necessary to mathematically define the feature of interest. All that is needed is to point out the images that have those features to train the CNN.

Indexed as

ButterfliesMothsAnimalsNeural Networks, ComputerPigmentationWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID36780440
PMCPMC9925015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.