Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780318›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2023

Rate Modulation Abilities in Acquired Motor Speech Disorders.

Rene L Utianski, Joseph R Duffy, Peter R Martin, Heather M Clark, Julie A G Stierwalt, Hugo Botha, Farwa Ali, Jennifer L Whitwell, Keith A Josephs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Characterizing Speech Errors Across Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech Subtypes.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rene L UtianskiDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-9519-1302
Joseph R DuffyDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-8206-3432
Peter R MartinDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Heather M ClarkDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-9697-0084
Julie A G StierwaltDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Hugo BothaDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-685X
Farwa AliDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jennifer L WhitwellDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-8074-6587
Keith A JosephsDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-2930-8634
Google (United States) · US

Funding

Longitudinal multi-modality imaging in progressive apraxia of speech (Diversity Supplement)R01DC012519 · NIDCD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Jennifer Louise Whitwell · 2013 to 2026
$7.2M
Longitudinal Multi-modal Imaging in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy SyndromesR01NS089757 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JOSEPHS, KEITH A, WHITWELL, JENNIFER LOUISE · 2015 to 2024
$5.6M
The neurobiology of two distinct types of progressive apraxia of speechR01DC014942 · NIDCD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Keith A Josephs, Rene Lynn Utianski · 2017 to 2026
$4.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012519NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014942NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS089757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to describe, compare, and understand speech modulation capabilities of patients with varying motor speech disorders (MSDs) in a paradigm in which patients made highly cued attempts to speak faster or slower.

methodTwenty-nine patients, 12 with apraxia of speech (AOS; four phonetic and eight prosodic subtype), eight with dysarthria (six hypokinetic and two spastic subtype), and nine patients without any neurogenic MSD completed a standard motor speech evaluation where they were asked to repeat words and sentences, which served as their "natural" speaking rate. They were then asked to repeat lower complexity (counting 1-5; repeating "cat" and "catnip" 3 times each) and higher complexity stimuli (repeating "catastrophe" and "stethoscope" 3 times each and "My physician wrote out a prescription" once) as fast/slow as possible. Word durations and interword intervals were measured. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess differences related to MSD subtype and stimuli complexity on bidirectional rate modulation capacity as indexed by word duration and interword interval. Articulatory accuracy was also judged and compared.

resultsPatients with prosodic AOS demonstrated a reduced ability to go faster; while they performed similarly to patients with spastic dysarthria when counting, patients with spastic dysarthria were able to increase rate similar to controls during sentence repetition; patients with prosodic AOS could not and made increased articulatory errors attempting to increase rate. AOS patients made more articulatory errors relative to other groups, regardless of condition; however, their percentage of errors reduced with an intentionally slowed speaking rate.

conclusionsThe findings suggest comparative rate modulation abilities in conjunction with their impact on articulatory accuracy may support differential diagnosis between healthy and abnormal speech and among subtypes of MSDs (i.e., type of dysarthria or AOS). Findings need to be validated in a larger, more representative cohort encompassing several types of MSDs. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22044632.

Indexed as

ApraxiasDysarthriaHumansPhoneticsSpeechSpeech DisordersSpeech Production Measurement

Identifiers

PMID36780318
PMCPMC10555464
OpenAlexW4320484833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.