Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780266›Full record

ArticleJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2023

Testing psychosocial interventions in the contexts they are meant to be delivered.

Rinad S Beidas, Lisa Saldana, Rachel C Shelton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Navigating grey areas in HIV and mental health implementation science.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Enhancing Impact: A Call to Action for Equitable Implementation Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Healthy Parent Carers: Acceptability and practicability of online delivery and learning through implementation by delivery partner organisations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  16. External and Internal Validity Considerations in Youth Effectiveness Trials: Lessons Learned from the COMET Study.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rinad S BeidasDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-6056-6071
Lisa SaldanaOregon Social Learning Center.ORCID 0000-0002-0792-6290
Rachel C SheltonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia's Mailman School of Public Health.ORCID 0000-0001-6496-6339

Funding

Preventing Parental Opioid and/or Methamphetamine Addiction within DHS-Involved Families: FAIRUH3DA050193 · NIDA · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI SALDANA, LISA · 2020 to 2020
$5.1M
Preventing Parental Opioid and/or Methamphetamine Addiction within DHS-Involved Families: FAIRUG3DA050193 · NIDA · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI SALDANA, LISA · 2019 to 2019
$684k
NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA050193NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA050193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article discusses psychosocial interventions in the contexts they are meant to be delivered. Prevention and intervention science often follow the linear pathway of preclinical or pre-intervention research-efficacy trials, effectiveness trials, and implementation studies-with the assessment of translation into public and population health impact occurring at the end. This linear translational pathway follows stages developed for ascertaining safe, efficacious, and effective dosages for biological compounds. This approach has created limitations in the need to rapidly deploy complex, multi-component, multilevel approaches to change behavior and improve health into widespread practice for diverse clinical and public health settings. While it is important to use efficacy trials when safety is yet to be established, when the risks are identified to be low, as is often the case for psychosocial interventions, we can go faster to achieve equitable population health impact. The authors recommend that clinical trialists engaged in intervention development incorporate two considerations in the next generation of prevention and intervention research. First, consider moving right to effectiveness or pragmatic trials, as the most valid test of an intervention is the est of that intervention in the context(s) in which it is intended. Second, when designing effectiveness studies, consider investigating questions related to both effectiveness (i.e., does the intervention improve clinical outcomes) and implementation (i.e., what supports are needed to deploy the intervention routinely in that context) to accelerate impact. As a matter of both ethics and equity, there is a need to expedite the research-to-practice pipeline at a pace faster than is made available through current approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Psychosocial InterventionHumans

Identifiers

PMID36780266
PMCPMC10175148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.