ArticleMachine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop)2021
Information Bottleneck Attribution for Visual Explanations of Diagnosis and Prognosis.
Article in Machine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric pancreas segmentation from MRI scans with deep learning.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Infectious Disease Imaging.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2023Article
- COVID-19 identification from volumetric chest CT scans using a progressively resized 3D-CNN incorporating segmentation, augmentation, and class-rebalancing.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual explanation methods have an important role in the prognosis of the patients where the annotated data is limited or unavailable. There have been several attempts to use gradient-based attribution methods to localize pathology from medical scans without using segmentation labels. This research direction has been impeded by the lack of robustness and reliability. These methods are highly sensitive to the network parameters. In this study, we introduce a robust visual explanation method to address this problem for medical applications. We provide an innovative visual explanation algorithm for general purpose and as an example application we demonstrate its effectiveness for quantifying lesions in the lungs caused by the Covid-19 with high accuracy and robustness without using dense segmentation labels. This approach overcomes the drawbacks of commonly used Grad-CAM and its extended versions. The premise behind our proposed strategy is that the information flow is minimized while ensuring the classifier prediction stays similar. Our findings indicate that the bottleneck condition provides a more stable severity estimation than the similar attribution methods. The source code will be publicly available upon publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.