Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780256›Full record

ArticleMachine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop)2021

Information Bottleneck Attribution for Visual Explanations of Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Ugur Demir, Ismail Irmakci, Elif Keles, Ahmet Topcu, Ziyue Xu, Concetto Spampinato, Sachin Jambawalikar, Evrim Turkbey, Baris Turkbey, Ulas Bagci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Machine learning in medical imaging. MLMI (Workshop), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pediatric pancreas segmentation from MRI scans with deep learning.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  2. Artificial Intelligence and Infectious Disease Imaging.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ugur DemirDepartment of Radiology and BME, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ismail IrmakciDepartment of Radiology and BME, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elif KelesDepartment of Radiology and BME, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ahmet TopcuTokat State Hospital, Tokat, Turkey.
Ziyue XuNVIDIA, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Concetto SpampinatoUniversity of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Sachin JambawalikarColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Evrim TurkbeyNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Baris TurkbeyNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ulas BagciDepartment of Radiology and BME, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Cyst-X: Interpretable Deep Learning Based Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Cystic TumorsR01CA246704 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Radiologist-Centered Artificial Intelligence (RCAI) for Lung Cancer Screening and DiagnosisR01CA240639 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240639NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual explanation methods have an important role in the prognosis of the patients where the annotated data is limited or unavailable. There have been several attempts to use gradient-based attribution methods to localize pathology from medical scans without using segmentation labels. This research direction has been impeded by the lack of robustness and reliability. These methods are highly sensitive to the network parameters. In this study, we introduce a robust visual explanation method to address this problem for medical applications. We provide an innovative visual explanation algorithm for general purpose and as an example application we demonstrate its effectiveness for quantifying lesions in the lungs caused by the Covid-19 with high accuracy and robustness without using dense segmentation labels. This approach overcomes the drawbacks of commonly used Grad-CAM and its extended versions. The premise behind our proposed strategy is that the information flow is minimized while ensuring the classifier prediction stays similar. Our findings indicate that the bottleneck condition provides a more stable severity estimation than the similar attribution methods. The source code will be publicly available upon publication.

Indexed as

Covid-19Information bottleneck attributionVisual explanationsWeakly supervised

Identifiers

PMID36780256
PMCPMC9921297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.