Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780224›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Social Media Data Mining of Antitobacco Campaign Messages: Machine Learning Analysis of Facebook Posts.

Shuo-Yu Lin, Xiaolu Cheng, Jun Zhang, Jaya Sindhu Yannam, Andrew J Barnes, J Randy Koch, Rashelle Hayes, Gilbert Gimm, Xiaoquan Zhao, Hemant Purohit and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Perceptions of Prevention and Cessation Ads among US Youth Who Use Multiple Tobacco Products: A Qualitative Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Growing Impact of Natural Language Processing in Healthcare and Public Health.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shuo-Yu LinDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4688-1424
Xiaolu ChengSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Changshu Institute of Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1181-2456
Jun ZhangDepartment of Physics and Engineering, College of Engineering and Science, Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania, Slippery Rock, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9324-3153
Jaya Sindhu YannamDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-6185
Andrew J BarnesDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0357-3934
J Randy KochDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8490-4100
Rashelle HayesDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6734-3997
Gilbert GimmDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6361-6951
Xiaoquan ZhaoDepartment of Communication, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0264-6262
Hemant PurohitDepartment of Information Sciences and Technology, College of Engineering and Computing, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4573-8450
Hong XueDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3641-6396

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media platforms provide a valuable source of public health information, as one-third of US adults seek specific health information online. Many antitobacco campaigns have recognized such trends among youth and have shifted their advertising time and effort toward digital platforms. Timely evidence is needed to inform the adaptation of antitobacco campaigns to changing social media platforms.

objectiveIn this study, we conducted a content analysis of major antitobacco campaigns on Facebook using machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) methods, as well as a traditional approach, to investigate the factors that may influence effective antismoking information dissemination and user engagement.

methodsWe collected 3515 posts and 28,125 associated comments from 7 large national and local antitobacco campaigns on Facebook between 2018 and 2021, including the Real Cost, Truth, CDC Tobacco Free (formally known as Tips from Former Smokers, where "CDC" refers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), the Tobacco Prevention Toolkit, Behind the Haze VA, the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, and Smoke Free US campaigns. NLP methods were used for content analysis, including parsimonious rule-based models for sentiment analysis and topic modeling. Logistic regression models were fitted to examine the relationship of antismoking message-framing strategies and viewer responses and engagement.

resultsWe found that large campaigns from government and nonprofit organizations had more user engagements compared to local and smaller campaigns. Facebook users were more likely to engage in negatively framed campaign posts. Negative posts tended to receive more negative comments (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.20-1.65). Positively framed posts generated more negative comments (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.66) as well as positive comments (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.13-1.48). Our content analysis and topic modeling uncovered that the most popular campaign posts tended to be informational (ie, providing new information), where the key phrases included talking about harmful chemicals (n=43, 43%) as well as the risk to pets (n=17, 17%).

conclusionsFacebook users tend to engage more in antitobacco educational campaigns that are framed negatively. The most popular campaign posts are those providing new information, with key phrases and topics discussing harmful chemicals and risks of secondhand smoke for pets. Educational campaign designers can use such insights to increase the reach of antismoking campaigns and promote behavioral changes.

Indexed as

Social MediaAdolescentAdultAdvertisingData MiningHumansInformation DisseminationPublic Healthcontent analysisengagementFacebooknatural language processingpublic healthsmokingsocial mediasocial media campaigntobaccotobacco controltopic modelinguseyouth

Identifiers

PMID36780224
PMCPMC9972210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.