Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780140›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

Beneficial and Detrimental Pressure-Related Effects on Inner Neurons in the Adult Porcine In Vitro Retina.

Frida Svare, Fredrik Ghosh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frida SvareDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik GhoshDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore pressure-related effects in the adult porcine retina in vitro. Methods: Retinal explants were subjected to 0, 10, 30, or 60 mmHg of pressure for 24 or 48 hours in culture. Overall tissue damage in sections was assessed by lactate dehydrogenase media levels, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and TUNEL staining. Inner retinal neurons were evaluated by protein kinase C alpha (rod bipolar cells), CHX10 (overall bipolar cell population), parvalbumin (amacrine cells), and RBPMS (ganglion cells) immunohistochemistry. Results: All retinas kept in culture displayed increased pyknosis and apoptosis compared with directly fixed controls. The 10-mmHg explants displayed attenuation of overall tissue damage compared with the 0-, 30-, and 60-mmHg counterparts. No difference in the number of rod bipolar cells was seen in the 10-mmHg explants compared with directly fixed controls, whereas significantly fewer cells were detected in the remaining pressure groups. No difference in the number of ganglion cells in the 0-, 10-, and 60-mmHg groups was seen compared with directly fixed controls after 24 hours, whereas a lower number was found in the 30-mmHg counterpart. A decline of ganglion cells was found in the 0-, 10-, and 60-mmHg group after 48 hours, but no further decrease was seen in the 30-mmHg group. No differences were detected in overall bipolar and amacrine cells in the pressure groups after 24 hours compared with directly fixed controls. Conclusions: A moderate amount of pressure attenuates culture-related retinal neurodegeneration. Rod bipolar cells are specifically vulnerable to excessive pressure. Translational Relevance: These findings are relevant for glaucoma-related research.

Indexed as

GlaucomaRetinaAnimalsImmunohistochemistryNeuronsSwine

Identifiers

PMID36780140
PMCPMC9927757
OpenAlexW4320486065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.