ArticleMolecular biotechnology2023
Anticancer and Biological Effects of Some Natural Compounds and Theoretical Investigation of them Against RdRP of SARS-COV-2: In Silico and In Vitro Studies.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Screening of herbal extracts binding with vascular endothelial growth factor by applying HerboChip platform.Chinese medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, Skullcapflavone I and Skullcapflavone II molecules showed good inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase and sorbitol dehydrogenase enzymes with IC50 values of 102.66 ± 8.43 and 95.04 ± 11.52 nM for α-glucosidase and 38.42 ± 3.82 and 28.81 ± 3.26 µM for sorbitol dehydrogenase. The chemical activities of Skullcapflavone I and Skullcapflavone II against α-glucosidase and sorbitol dehydrogenase were assessed by conducting the molecular docking study. The anticancer activities of the compounds were examined against SW-626, SK-OV-3, OVCAR3, and Caov-3 cell lines. The chemical activities of Skullcapflavone I and Skullcapflavone II against some of the expressed surface receptor proteins (estrogen receptor, EGFR, androgen receptor, and GnRH receptor) in the mentioned cell lines were investigated using in silico calculations. Moreover, the activity of the compounds against RNA polymerase of SARS-COVE-2 was also assessed using the molecular modeling study. These compounds created strong contacts with the enzymes and receptors. The considerable binding affinity of the compounds to the enzymes and proteins showed their ability as inhibitors. Furthermore, even at modest dosages, these substances markedly reduced the viability of ovarian cancer cells. Additionally, the viability of ovarian cancer cells was significantly decreased by a 300 μM dosage of all compounds. Antiovarian cancer results of Skullcapflavone I on SK-OV-3, SW-626, OVCAR3, and Caov-3 were 63.14, 1.55, 19.42, and 52.04 µM, respectively. Also, cytotoxicity results of Skullcapflavone II on SK-OV-3, SW-626, OVCAR3, and Caov-3 were 5.18, 21.44, 33.87, and 72.66 µM, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.