Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36780055›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Impact of hands-on practice with HugoRAS and Versius System simulators on the attractiveness of robotic surgery among medical and nurse undergraduate students.

Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Stefano Terzoni, Elena Scanferla, Pietro Paolo Bianchi, Giampaolo Formisano, Giorgia Gaia, Anna Maria Marconi, Davide Chiumello, Vipul Patel, Marcio Covas Moschovas and 13 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Chiara SighinolfiFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy. sighinolfic@gmail.com.
Stefano TerzoniFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Elena ScanferlaFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Pietro Paolo BianchiUnit of General Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Giampaolo FormisanoUnit of General Surgery, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Giorgia GaiaUnit of Gynecology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Anna Maria MarconiUnit of Gynecology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Davide ChiumelloUnit of Anesthesiology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Vipul PatelAdventhealth, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Marcio Covas MoschovasAdventhealth, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Filippo TurriFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Dell'OrtoFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Serena MarucciaFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Angelica GrassoFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Mattia SangalliFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Stefano CentanniDepartment of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Matteo StoccoDepartment of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Simone AssummaFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Luca SarchiFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Tommaso CalcagnileFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Enrico PanioFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio BozziniUnit of Urology, ASST Lariana, Como, Italy.
Bernardo RoccoFrom the Unit of Urology, Department of Health Science-La Statale University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Via Rudini 8, Milan, Italy.
AOL (United States) · USUniversity of Milan · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITUniversity of Central Florida · USAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scenario of robotic surgery is rapidly evolving with the introduction of new robotic systems. A structured learning program in robotic surgery during academic education is often lacking, especially for undergraduates; as a result, many students may be unaware of indications to robotic surgery and technological progress. The aim of the study is to evaluate the knowledge and interest toward robotic surgery of medical and nurse students, and to analyze how the attractiveness may change after a hand-on training course with new simulators of Hugo RAS and Versius System. We performed a cross-sectional study involving medical and nurse students recruited on a voluntary basis at ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan; participants were invited to join a hands-on practice simulation with the Hugo RAS and/or Versius Trainer Simulator. Before the hand-on exercise, students were asked to fulfill an online anonymous questionnaire addressing knowledge and interest toward robotic surgery. After a 2-h hands-on exercises at the Hugo RAS and/or at the Versius Trainer simulator (preceded by a brief lecture on robotic surgery and new systems), participants were asked to complete a second-round questionnaire to evaluate changes in attractiveness toward robotic surgery. Data were recorded in a database; after a descriptive analysis of the variables, median values were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test, frequencies with the Fisher's exact test and in the case of paired observations (before and after the simulation), the Mc Nemar test was used. Forty-one undergraduates agreed to participate. Twenty-three nursing students and 18 medical students were recruited. Some of them had a basic knowledge in robotic surgery and were able to figure out some surgical indications, given the presence of a robotic program already settled up at the institution. Before the hands-on course, 44.0% nurse students and 36.6% of medical students were interested in surgical disciplines and robotic surgery. After the simulation, all students (100%) reported a high level of interest in robotic surgery and some of them required for a dedicated internship (p < 0.001). The students provided also feedback on the perceived ease-of-use of the robotic simulators (on a scale 0-10); overall, the median score was 8, IQR [7-8], with no differences between nursing and medical students (p = 0.482). In conclusion, the study demonstrates a great interest toward robotic surgery as a part of medical and nurse education. A hands-on simulation further improved the interest of undergraduates from both backgrounds. The technological progress with the availability of new surgical systems will be the future challenge of training programs and should be considered at all levels of education.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumHumansNew robotic platformsRobotic surgeryTrainingUndergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID36780055
OpenAlexW4320489780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.