Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36779758›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2023

Immunity to Seasonal Coronavirus Spike Proteins Does Not Protect from SARS-CoV-2 Challenge in a Mouse Model but Has No Detrimental Effect on Protection Mediated by COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination.

Fatima Amanat, Jordan Clark, Juan Manuel Carreño, Shirin Strohmeier, Temima Yellin, Philip S Meade, Disha Bhavsar, Hiromi Muramatsu, Weina Sun, Lynda Coughlan and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Seroprevalence of Coronavirus NL63 in Yamagata, Japan, Between 1976 and 2022.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fatima AmanatDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Jordan ClarkDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Juan Manuel CarreñoDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Shirin StrohmeierDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Temima YellinDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Philip S MeadeDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Disha BhavsarDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Hiromi MuramatsuDepartment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Weina SunDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2435-5047
Lynda CoughlanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9880-6560
Norbert PardiDepartment of Microbiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Florian KrammerDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4121-776X
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

COLLABORATIVE INFLUENZA VACCINE INNOVATION CENTER: UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA VACCINE RESEARCH75N93019C00051 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KRAMMER, FLORIAN · 2019 to 2025
$105.4M
NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00051NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400008C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seasonal coronaviruses have been circulating widely in the human population for many years. With increasing age, humans are more likely to have been exposed to these viruses and to have developed immunity against them. It has been hypothesized that this immunity to seasonal coronaviruses may provide partial protection against infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and it has also been shown that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination induces a back-boosting effects against the spike proteins of seasonal betacoronaviruses. In this study, we tested if immunity to the seasonal coronavirus spikes from OC43, HKU1, 229E, or NL63 would confer protection against SARS-CoV-2 challenge in a mouse model, and whether pre-existing immunity against these spikes would weaken the protection afforded by mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. We found that mice vaccinated with the seasonal coronavirus spike proteins had no increased protection compared to the negative controls. While a negligible back-boosting effect against betacoronavirus spike proteins was observed after SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was no negative original antigenic sin-like effect on the immune response and protection induced by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in animals with pre-existing immunity to seasonal coronavirus spike proteins.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAnimalsCOVID-19Cross ProtectionHumansMiceSeasonsVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2cross-reactive antibodySARS-CoV-2seasonal coronavirusesspike

Identifiers

PMID36779758
PMCPMC10062180
OpenAlexW4320490559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.