Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36779270›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2023

Characterization of 3D printed biodegradable piezoelectric scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Divakar Karanth, David Puleo, Dolph Dawson, L S Holliday, Lina Sharab

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Advanced Piezoelectric Materials, Devices, and Systems for Orthopedic Medicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Divakar KaranthDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6251-1223
David PuleoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Mississippi, University Park, Mississippi, USA.
Dolph DawsonDepartment of Periodontics, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
L S HollidayDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Florida College of Dentistry, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0844-1965
Lina SharabDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe primary objective of this research was to develop a poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA) scaffold and evaluate critical characteristics essential for its biologic use as a craniofacial implant. MATERIALS AND

methodsPLLA scaffolds were designed and fabricated using fused deposition modeling technology. The surface morphology and microarchitecture were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and microCT, respectively. Crystallography, compressive modulus, and the piezoelectric potential generated upon mechanical distortion were characterized. Hydrolytic degradation was studied. MG63 osteoblast-like cell proliferation and morphology were assessed.

resultsThe porosity of the scaffolds was 73%, with an average pore size of 450 µm and an average scaffold fiber thickness of 130 µm. The average compressive modulus was 244 MPa, and the scaffolds generated an electric potential of 25 mV upon cyclic/repeated loading. The crystallinity reduced from 27.5% to 13.9% during the 3D printing process. The hydrolytic degradation was minimal during a 12-week period. Osteoblast-like cells did not attach to the uncoated scaffold but attached well after coating the scaffold with fibrinogen. They then proliferated to cover the complete scaffold by Day 14.

conclusionThe PLLA scaffolds were designed and printed, proving the feasibility of 3D printing as a method of fabricating PLLA scaffolds. The elastic modulus was comparable to that of trabecular bone, and the piezoelectric properties of the PLLA were retained after 3D printing. The scaffolds were cytocompatible. These 3D-printed PLLA scaffolds showed promising properties akin to the natural bone, and they warrant further investigation for bone regeneration.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationTissue ScaffoldsPorosityPrinting, Three-Dimensional3D printingbone regenerationbone tissue engineeringpoly(l-lactic acid)

Identifiers

PMID36779270
PMCPMC10098282
OpenAlexW4320495983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.