ArticleApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2022
Professional Student Education and Training During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has presented numerous challenges to education at all levels, but has been particularly challenging for professional schools and other educational sectors that require intensive hands-on training. Those institutions have had to deploy and continuously adapt new learning strategies in response to an ever-changing pandemic landscape over the past two years, while at the same time meeting the rigorous proficiency standards for their students. Methods: This communication describes how two professional schools at Oregon State University, the College of Pharmacy and the Carlson College of Veterinary Medicine, pivoted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure continuity in student training. The adaptations included technological solutions, physical distancing, barriers, reduced group size and scheduling changes in the curriculum, and enhanced personal protective equipment. Results: The available evidence suggest that the biosafety measures implemented to reduce the risk of COVID-19 in the hands-on educational setting appear to have been effective in preventing transmission during classroom and experiential learning activities. Professional licensing exam scores for the students of both colleges remain as high as pre-pandemic values, suggesting that the implemented changes in instruction did not have a detrimental impact on student learning. The scores will need to be monitored for several more years before firm conclusions can be drawn. Discussion: Both colleges implemented creative solutions to the delivery of hands-on pedagogy that sought to balance risk of infection and the necessity to master critical skills that can only be acquired by active learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.