Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36779105›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Beta-Blocker and Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity With BRASH Syndrome: A Case Report.

Adolfo Martinez, Niket Shah, Andrew Kim, Kevin Watat, Sandeep Banga

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adolfo MartinezInternal Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Niket ShahInternal Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Andrew KimInternal Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Kevin WatatInternal Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Sandeep BangaCardiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrioventricular (AV) nodal blockers have a wide variety of medical uses, including the management of hypertension and cardiac arrhythmias. Like any other drug, they can carry side effects and toxicity. We present a case of a patient with a constellation of findings consistent with bradycardia, renal failure, AV nodal blockade, shock, and hyperkalemia (BRASH) syndrome. A 75-year-old female with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction presented to the hospital with shortness of breath. She was discharged two weeks prior to the presentation from another hospital after being treated for atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response. She was discharged on metoprolol and diltiazem. Upon presentation to the hospital, the patient was noted to be bradycardic and hypotensive with blood work notable for acute kidney injury and hyperkalemia, consistent with BRASH syndrome. She received a dose of intravenous (IV) glucagon followed by infusion and received epinephrine infusion. Once clinically stable, she was discharged with her home dose of metoprolol and a reduced dose of diltiazem with a close follow-up with cardiology. Early recognition of BRASH syndrome as a unique clinical entity rather than different pathologic conditions is important to improve morbidity and mortality in these patients.

Indexed as

beta blockerbradycardiabrash syndromecalcium channel blockercase reporthyperkalemiarenal failure

Identifiers

PMID36779105
PMCPMC9907465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.