ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Pituitary stalk changes on magnetic resonance imaging following pituitary adenoma resection using a transsphenoidal approach.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postoperative Pituitary MRI Findings in Acromegaly: A Pictorial Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to investigate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical significance of position and changes in morphology of the pituitary stalk following pituitary adenoma (PA) resection using a transsphenoidal approach. Methods: We collected clinical and MRI data of 108 patients with PA after transsphenoidal surgery. Diameter, length, and coronal deviation of the pituitary stalk were measured pre-, post-, and mid-term post-operatively, to observe pituitary stalk morphology. Results: Of 108 patients, 53 pituitary stalks were recognisable pre-operatively. The angle between the pituitary stalk and the median line was 7.22°-50.20° (average, 25.85°) in 22 patients with left-sided pituitary stalks and 5.32°-64.05° (average, 21.63°) in 20 patients with right-sided pituitary stalks. Of 42 patients with preoperative pituitary stalk deviation, 41 had an early postoperative recovery and 1 had increased deviation. In the mid-term postoperative period, 21 of 42 patients had pituitary stalks located centrally. In 53 patients, the pituitary stalk length was 1.41-11.74 mm (mean, 6.12 mm) pre-operatively, 3.61-11.63 mm (mean, 6.93 mm) in the early postoperative period, and 5.37-17.57 mm (mean, 8.83 mm) in the mid-term postoperative period. In the early postoperative period, 58 (53.70%) patients had posterior pituitary bright spots (PPBS) and 28 (25.92%) had diabetes insipidus (DI). Conclusion: Pre-operatively, the pituitary stalk was compressed and thinned. Post-operatively, it could be stretched to a "normal state", and its position showed a gradual centring trend. Post-operatively, the length of the pituitary stalk gradually increased. The PPBS in the early postoperative period negatively correlated with postoperative DI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.