Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36779055›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2023

Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive and motor functions in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shuiyan Li, Qi Zhang, Shuqi Zheng, Gege Li, Shilin Li, Longlong He, Yuting Zeng, Ling Chen, Shuping Chen, Xiaoyan Zheng and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brain stimulation for patients with multiple sclerosis: an umbrella review of therapeutic efficacy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuiyan LiSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qi ZhangSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuqi ZhengSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Gege LiSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shilin LiSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Longlong HeSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuting ZengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ling ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuping ChenSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyan ZhengSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jihua ZouSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qing ZengSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on cognitive and motor functions in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Methods: A literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, CNKI, and Wan fang. The time interval used for database construction was up to December 2022, and the language was not limited. The collected trials were subsequently screened, the data were extracted, the quality was evaluated, and the effect sizes were computed using STATA/MP Version 13 for outcome analysis. Standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for domain of interest. Results: In total, 17 articles that examined 364 patients with multiple sclerosis were included in this analysis. Non-invasive brain stimulation did not improve the overall cognitive function [SMD = 0.18, 95% CI (-0.32, 0.69), Conclusion: These results of this present study provide evidence that non-invasive brain stimulation could improve alertness in pwMS. Furthermore, NIBS may help pwMS with motor function and those who are under 45 years of age or with EDSS < 3.5 improve their motor function. For the therapeutic use of NIBS, we recommend applying transcranial magnetic stimulation as an intervention and located on the motor cortex M1 according to the subgroup analysis of motor function. These findings warrant verification. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022301012.

Indexed as

cognition functionmeta-analysismotor functionmultiple sclerosisnon-invasive brain stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36779055
PMCPMC9911042
OpenAlexW4318065590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.