ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2023
Computed Tomography Evaluation of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Inserted during Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Long-term Follow-up Results of Screw Violation.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Innovative Pedicle Screw Insertion with Mixed Reality Technology Improves Insertion Accuracy in Spinal Surgery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion in degenerative lumbar disease treated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and to analyze risk factors and long-term clinical outcomes of screw violation. Methods: Sixty-two consecutive patients (262 screws) were included. Based on postoperative computed tomography (CT) axial images, a PPS that perforated out of the pedicle was classified into a violation group, while screws surrounded by pedicular cortical bone were classified into a correct group. A logistic regression model was used for risk factor analysis of violation. We also observed the long-term clinical outcomes using the Oswestry disability index and visual analog scale. Results: Of the 262 screws, 14 (5.3%) were considered to be violated (10 medial violations and 4 lateral violations). All violations of S1 and L5 were in the medial direction. In contrast, entire violations of L4 were always lateral and of the 2 violations of L3, one was lateral and the other was medial. There were no cases of superior or inferior violation. The mean pedicle convergence angle (CA) was significantly higher in the violation group (mean ± standard deviation, 27.0° ± 6.2°) than in the correct group (21.7° ± 5.4°). There were no significant differences according to vertebral rotational angle, body mass index, bone mineral density, and surgical timing (learning curve) between the two groups. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that a high CA was a significant risk factor for pedicle wall violation ( Conclusions: With PPS insertion during MI-TLIF, the rate of pedicle violation was 5.3% (14/262). An understanding of the anatomical characteristics of each vertebra and the unique structures of the patient is essential to prevent pedicle violations. Even in the violation group, PPS fixation was found to be a safe and useful procedure with successful long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.