ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2023
Validity and Reliability of Prognosis Brachial Plexus Injury Score for Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor regarding "Brachial plexus compression following a laterjet procedure".JPRAS open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brachial plexus injury (BPI) is a peripheral nerve injury that results in severe functional impairment and disability. Even after prompt treatment, predicting the prognosis of BPI is not easy as it involves various factors. An objective and valid scoring system would aid clinicians in informing families and anticipating problems related to the recovery of BPI. Prognosis BPI (PRO-BPI) score, a new prognostic score to predict the outcome of traumatic BPI (TBPI), was developed in 2019 by Suroto and Rahman. This study aimed to evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis was conducted for 111 BPI patients. A serial assessment of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and PRO-BPI score was done. Validity analysis was done by assessing Spearman correlations between PRO-BPI score and other scoring systems (DASH, Michigan hand outcomes, and 36-item short form survey score [SF-36]). Internal structure consistency using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability were measured for reliability analyses. A Results: A total of 96 male and 15 female patients were included in our study with a mean age of 27.9 ± 10.6 years. Most of the patients (56.75%) had a poor prognosis based on the scoring system (average, 14.38 ± 3.98). Major contributors of this low score were the persistent pain (score 1 in 57.7% patients) and initial pain scale score (score 1 in 31.5% patients). Validity test showed that 6 parameters were all valid ( Conclusions: PRO-BPI score is a valid and reliable scoring system in predicting the prognosis of TBPI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.