ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602021
Persistence With Biologic Therapy and Associated Costs of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A German Retrospective Claims Data Analysis.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Safety Outcomes of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Therapy in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Phage-Display Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Reveals Distinct Antibody Signatures Against Bacterial Flagellins Associated With Treatment Response in Crohn's Disease.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Predictors of First Anti-TNF Treatment Failure in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Single and multiple switches, swap and retransitioning among 28,073 biological drug users with inflammatory bowel diseases: results from the Italian VALORE network.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Medication Burden Before and After Prescription of Biologics in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Real-World Long-Term Persistence and Surgical Procedure-Free Period Among Bio-naïve Patients with Crohn's Disease and Fistula Initiated on Ustekinumab.Advances in therapy · 2024Article
- Treatment persistence and switching patterns of ABP 501 in European patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab Biosimilar GP2017 in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and Safety Profiles of Biological Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real Life Data from an Active Pharmacovigilance Project.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Treatment Pathways and Health Outcomes of German Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Health Claims Data Analysis.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, biologic agents became a relevant and promising treatment option for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). However, high treatment costs and moderate remission rates lead to a high interest in treatment persistence and corresponding economic consequences. Methods: A retrospective health claims data analysis was conducted including biologic naive patients diagnosed with IBD between 2013 and 2018. Observation points were at 12 and 18 months of follow-up, starting from the first biologic prescription. Nonpersistence was defined as either no further prescription or prescription of another biologic agent within the days of supply per original prescription. Biologic agents included were Adalimumab, Golimumab, Infliximab, Ustekinumab, and Vedolizumab. Results: In total, 1444 patients with IBD were included in this analysis, mostly treated with Adalimumab (46.9%) and Infliximab (39.9%) as their first biologic treatment. After 12 months, 72.2% of patients were still persistent with their initial biologic treatment with the highest shares for Infliximab (74%) and Vedolizumab (72.4%). 27.8% of patients were nonpersistent, mostly due to a switch of biologic agent (75.8%). Cox regression identified female, hospitalizations, and simultaneous prescriptions of corticosteroids and immunomodulators as risk factors for nonpersistence. Treatment costs per year were approximately 3000€ higher for nonpersistent patients (27,146€) than for persistent patients (23,839€), mostly due to inpatient treatment costs. Conclusions: The persistence of biologic therapy in this study was rather high at 72% after 12 months, while nonpersistence was mostly due to switches to other biologic agents. Lack of persistence is associated with increased cost, mostly due to nonbiologic medication and inpatient treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.