ArticleJournal of oncology2023
Identification and Analysis of Crucial Genes in
Article in Journal of oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Coexpression network analysis of gastric adenocarcinoma identifies hub genes as biomarker candidates and their tumor microenvironment associations.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Mendelian randomization analyses support causal relationships between unswitched memory B cells and lung squamous cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Multi-omics analysis of Helicobacter pylori-associated gastric cancer identifies hub genes as a novel therapeutic biomarker.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Research progress on ADAM28 in malignant tumors.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Computational prediction of crucial genes involved in gonorrhea infection and neoplastic cell transformation: A multiomics approach.Microbial pathogenesis · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of T-cell regulatory factors and tumor immune microenvironment in stomach adenocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The relationship between Materials and Methods: The dataset GSE13195 was chosen to search for abnormally expressed genes in Results: In GSE13195, a total of 332 differential expression genes (DEGs) were screened. The results of weighted gene co-expression network analysis showed that the light cyan, plum2, black, and magenta4 modules were associated with stages ( Conclusion: Our study identified five key genes involved in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.