Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36778797›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Perfusion index as a predictor of working pediatric caudal block under general anesthesia- A prospective observational study.

Karthika Rajan, Nandini Dave, Raylene Dias, Priyanka Muneshwar, Nikhil Kesarkar, Vishal Saxena

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06846983 (Peripheral Perfusion Index as an Early Predictor of Successful Caudal Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominopelvic Surgeries Under General Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06846983 recruitingnot on this map

Peripheral Perfusion Index as an Early Predictor of Successful Caudal Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominopelvic Surgeries Under General Anesthesia

TypeobservationalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsPeripheral Perfusion Index, Caudal BlockArmsPeripheral perfusion index pulse oximeter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Karthika RajanSenior Resident, Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Nandini DaveSenior Consultant and Head of Department, Department of Anaesthesiology, SRCC Children's Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Raylene DiasAssistant Professor. Depatment of Paediatric Anaesthesiology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Priyanka MuneshwarFellow, Departmentof Paediatric Anaesthesiology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Nikhil KesarkarSenior Resident, Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Vishal SaxenaSenior Resident, Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Advances in pulse oximeter technology have enabled us to measure parameters such as perfusion index (PI). We aimed to ascertain the utility of PI in the lower limb for evaluating the onset and adequacy of the pediatric caudal block under general anesthesia. The primary objective was to monitor PI trends after caudal block. The secondary objective was to compare the role of PI, heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in detecting onset and adequacy of caudal block and to ascertain whether PI was an earlier indicator in detecting adequate block. Material and Methods: Twenty-five children between 1 and 6 years, who underwent general anesthesia (GA) with caudal block were included. Baseline PI, HR, and MAP were recorded prior to and post caudal block at 5, 10, 15, 20 min and on skin incision. The onset of adequate block was defined as 100% increase of PI from baseline, 15% decrease of MAP or HR from baseline. T-test was used to compare trends of PI with baseline and the number of patients who met or failed these criteria for each of these three parameters at various time intervals wasnoted. Results: PI increased at all time intervals in 23 of 25 patients with working caudal block ( Conclusion: PI is an earlier and more sensitive indicator of the onset of the caudal block under general anesthesia (GA) than HR and MAP.

Indexed as

Caudal blockgeneral anesthesiaheart ratepediatricperfusion index

Identifiers

PMID36778797
PMCPMC9912897
OpenAlexW4313268525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.