ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2023
Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Pressure Injury Image Data Using Mask-R-CNN.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Methods for Diagnostic and Decision-Making Assistance in Chronic Wounds: A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and other best practice recommendations for pressure injury risk assessment in the United States.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyPooled it
- Unimodal and Multimodal Deep Learning for Pressure Injury Identification: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Convolutional Neural Network Models for Visual Classification of Pressure Ulcer Stages: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Advancements in Wound Dressing Materials: Highlighting Recent Progress in Hydrogels, Foams, and Antimicrobial Dressings.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- YOLO-Based Deep Learning Model for Pressure Ulcer Detection and Classification.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Pressure injuries (PIs) impose a substantial burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems, affecting an estimated 3 million Americans and costing nearly $18 billion annually. Accurate pressure injury staging remains clinically challenging. Over the last decade, object detection and semantic segmentation have evolved quickly with new methods invented and new application areas emerging. Simultaneous object detection and segmentation paved the way to segment and classify anatomical structures. In this study, we utilize the Mask-R-CNN algorithm for segmentation and classification of stage 1-4 pressure injuries. Methods: Images from the eKare Inc. pressure injury wound data repository were segmented and classified manually by two study authors with medical training. The Mask-R-CNN model was implemented using the Keras deep learning and TensorFlow libraries with Python. We split 969 pressure injury images into training (87.5%) and validation (12.5%) subsets for Mask-R-CNN training. Results: We included 121 random pressure injury images in our test set. The Mask-R-CNN model showed overall classification accuracy of 92.6%, and the segmentation demonstrated 93.0% accuracy. Our F1 scores for stages 1-4 were 0.842, 0.947, 0.907, and 0.944, respectively. Our Dice coefficients for stages 1-4 were 0.92, 0.85, 0.93, and 0.91, respectively. Conclusions: Our Mask-R-CNN model provides levels of accuracy considerably greater than the average healthcare professional who works with pressure injury patients. This tool can be easily incorporated into the clinician's workflow to aid in the hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.