Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36778633›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Developing fit-for-purpose funding models for rural settings: Lessons from the evaluation of a step-up/step-down service in regional Australia.

Mathew Coleman, Beatriz Cuesta-Briand, Hanh Ngo, Rachel Bass, Naomi Mills-Edward, Priscilla Ennals

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mathew ColemanThe Rural Clinical School of WA, The University of Western Australia, Albany, WA, Australia.
Beatriz Cuesta-BriandThe Rural Clinical School of WA, The University of Western Australia, Albany, WA, Australia.
Hanh NgoThe Rural Clinical School of WA, The University of Western Australia, Albany, WA, Australia.
Rachel BassNeami National, Albany, WA, Australia.
Naomi Mills-EdwardNeami National, Burswood, WA, Australia.
Priscilla EnnalsNeami National, Preston, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sub-acute mental health community services provide a bridging service between hospital and community care. There is limited understanding of the local factors that influence success, and of the funding implications of delivering services in rural areas. Methods: This paper draws from quantitative and qualitative evaluation data from a regional Western Australian service to explore these issues. Results: Consumers satisfaction with the service was high and, overall, admission to the service resulted in positive outcomes. High re-admission rates may be linked to limited community support services following discharge. Discussion: Our results suggest that outcomes may be enhanced by implementing flexible approaches that address the resource limitations of the rural context, and that the current funding model for sub-acute mental health services in rural Australian may not be fit for purpose. More needs to be understood about how these services can be better integrated with existing support services, and how they can be better funded.

Indexed as

community mental healthfunding modelrural disparitiesrural settingsservice evaluationstep-up/step-down care

Identifiers

PMID36778633
PMCPMC9911213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.