Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36778565›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

An intelligent medical guidance and recommendation model driven by patient-physician communication data.

Jusheng Liu, Chaoran Li, Ye Huang, Jingti Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jusheng LiuSchool of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China.
Chaoran LiSchool of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Ye HuangSchool of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.
Jingti HanSchool of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the online patient-physician communication data, this study used natural language processing and machine learning algorithm to construct a medical intelligent guidance and recommendation model. First, based on 16,935 patient main complaint data of nine diseases, this study used the word2vec, long-term and short-term memory neural networks, and other machine learning algorithms to construct intelligent department guidance and recommendation model. Besides, taking ophthalmology as an example, it also used the word2vec, TF-IDF, and cosine similarity algorithm to construct an intelligent physician recommendation model. Furthermore, to recommend physicians with better service quality, this study introduced the information amount of physicians' feedback to the recommendation evaluation indicator as the text and voice service quality. The results show that the department guidance model constructed by long-term and short-term memory neural networks has the best effect. The precision is 82.84%, and the F1-score is 82.61% in the test set. The prediction effect of the LSTM model is better than TextCNN, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine algorithms. In the intelligent physician recommendation model, under certain parameter settings, the recommendation effect of the hybrid recommendation model based on similar patients and similar physicians has certain advantages over the model of similar patients and similar physicians.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPhysiciansAlgorithmsCommunicationHumansMachine Learninghealthcarenatural language processingpatient-physician communication datarecommendation systemtext analytics

Identifiers

PMID36778565
PMCPMC9909411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.