ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
An intelligent medical guidance and recommendation model driven by patient-physician communication data.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Hospital Course Summarization by an Electronic Health Record-Based Large Language Model.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Novel Approach to Personalized Physician Recommendations Using Semantic Features and Response Metrics: Model Evaluation Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Assessing usability of intelligent guidance chatbots in Chinese hospitals: Cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on the online patient-physician communication data, this study used natural language processing and machine learning algorithm to construct a medical intelligent guidance and recommendation model. First, based on 16,935 patient main complaint data of nine diseases, this study used the word2vec, long-term and short-term memory neural networks, and other machine learning algorithms to construct intelligent department guidance and recommendation model. Besides, taking ophthalmology as an example, it also used the word2vec, TF-IDF, and cosine similarity algorithm to construct an intelligent physician recommendation model. Furthermore, to recommend physicians with better service quality, this study introduced the information amount of physicians' feedback to the recommendation evaluation indicator as the text and voice service quality. The results show that the department guidance model constructed by long-term and short-term memory neural networks has the best effect. The precision is 82.84%, and the F1-score is 82.61% in the test set. The prediction effect of the LSTM model is better than TextCNN, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine algorithms. In the intelligent physician recommendation model, under certain parameter settings, the recommendation effect of the hybrid recommendation model based on similar patients and similar physicians has certain advantages over the model of similar patients and similar physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.