Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36778510›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602022

Models of Care for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A National Cross-sectional Survey to Characterize the Landscape of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care in Canada.

Matthew Miles, Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez, Courtney Heisler, Yunsong Cui, Holly Mathias, Michael Stewart, Jennifer L Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Models of outpatient care delivery in inflammatory bowel disease: a scoping review.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  2. The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Access to and Models of Care.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew MilesDivision of Digestive Care and Endoscopy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Juan Nicolás Peña-SánchezDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Courtney HeislerDivision of Digestive Care and Endoscopy, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Yunsong CuiAtlantic PATH, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Holly MathiasSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0094-2466
Michael StewartDivision of Digestive Care and Endoscopy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jennifer L JonesDivision of Digestive Care and Endoscopy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6380-6728

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Collaborative care models improve inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient outcomes, yet little is known about the capacity or available resources to deliver such model of care in Canada. We aimed to describe the structure and process characteristics of clinical care delivery models for IBD across Canada, including the number of collaborative care centers. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2017 and October 2018 through an online survey. This survey was distributed to gastroenterologists at community and academic centers across Canada who provide care for IBD patients. Comparisons between collaborative and non-collaborative centers were analyzed using chi-squares or Results: Seventy-two gastroenterologists from 62 unique IBD centers completed the survey. A total of 7 unique collaborative centers and 55 unique non-collaborative centers were identified. There were significant differences between collaborative and non-collaborative centers in some aspects of access to IBD care, patient assessment and referral process, and patent education and empowerment. Notably, very few centers had processes for implementing and evaluating evidence-based clinical pathways, and auditing quality indicators. Conclusions: Our findings identify areas for improving the quality of IBD care in Canada. Expanding the number of and access to collaborative care centers in Canada is needed, in addition to increased focus on patient education, communication, and implementation of evidence-based care pathways.

Indexed as

collaborative careinflammatory bowel diseasequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID36778510
PMCPMC9802273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.