Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36778375›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat Tourette syndrome: A randomized crossover trial.

Ann M Iverson, Amanda L Arbuckle, Keisuke Ueda, David Y Song, Emily C Bihun, Jonathan M Koller, Michael Wallendorf, Kevin J Black

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04731714 (Peripheral Induction of Inhibitory Brain Circuits to Treat Tourette's), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04731714 nacompletednot on this map

Peripheral Induction of Inhibitory Brain Circuits to Treat Tourette's: Pilot

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2021 to 2022Enrolled34ConditionsTourette Syndrome, Tic Disorders, Tic Disorder, Chronic Motor or VocalArmsRhythmic median nerve stimulation, Arrhythmic median nerve stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ann M IversonWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0001-8844-7752
Amanda L ArbuckleDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0001-8267-580X
Keisuke UedaDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0003-4087-6018
David Y SongUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-2178-9480
Emily C BihunDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-4498
Jonathan M KollerDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0002-1409-5608
Michael WallendorfDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0003-3005-3026
Kevin J BlackDepartments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Radiology, and Neuroscience, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-6921-9567
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prior study showed that rhythmic, but not arrhythmic, 12 Hz stimulation of the median nerve (MNS) entrained sensorimotor cortex EEG signal, and found that 10 Hz MNS improved tics in Tourette syndrome (TS). However, no control condition was tested and stimulation blocks lasted only 1 minute. We set out to replicate the TS results and to test whether tic improvement occurs by the proposed cortical entrainment mechanism. Thirty-two people with TS, age 15-64, completed two study visits with repeated MNS on and off blocks in random order, one visit for rhythmic and one for arrhythmic MNS. Subjects and staff were blind to order; a video rater was additionally blind to stimulation and to order of visits and blocks. Rhythmic MNS at 10 Hz improved tics. Both rhythmic and arrhythmic 12 Hz MNS improved tic frequency, intensity and urges without significant difference. Participant masking was effective and there was no carryover effect. Several participants described dramatic benefit. Discomfort was minimal. MNS benefit did not persist after the end of stimulation. These results replicate the tic benefit from MNS, but show that the EEG entrainment hypothesis cannot explain that benefit. Another electrophysiological mechanism may explain benefit; alternatively, these data do not exclude a placebo effect. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04731714 .

Identifiers

PMID36778375
PMCPMC9915823
OpenAlexW4319160435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.