ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Assignment of molecular origins of NOE signal at -3.5 ppm in the brain.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement mediated saturation transfer effect, termed NOE(-3.5 ppm), is a major source of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI contrasts at 3.5 ppm in the brain. Previous phantom experiments have demonstrated that both proteins and lipids, two major components in tissues, have substantial contributions to NOE(-3.5 ppm) signals. Their relative contributions in tissues are informative for the interpretation of NOE(-3.5 ppm) contrasts that could provide potential imaging biomarkers for relevant diseases, which remain incompletely understood. Methods: Experiments on homogenates and supernatants of brain tissues collected from healthy rats, that could isolate proteins from lipids, were performed to evaluate the relative contribution of lipids to NOE(-3.5 ppm) signals. On the other hand, experiments on ghost membranes with varied pH, and reconstituted phospholipids with different chemical compositions were conducted to study the dependence of NOE(-3.5 ppm) on physiological conditions. Besides, CEST imaging on rat brains bearing 9L tumors and healthy rat brains was performed to analyze the causes of the NOE(-3.5 ppm) contrast variations between tumors and normal tissues, and between gray matter and white matter. Results: Our experiments reveal that lipids have dominant contributions to the NOE (-3.5 ppm) signals. Further analysis suggests that decreased NOE(-3.5 ppm) signals in tumors and higher NOE(-3.5 ppm) signals in white matter than in gray matter are mainly explained by changes in membrane lipids, rather than proteins. Conclusion: NOE(-3.5 ppm) could be exploited as a highly sensitive MRI contrast for imaging membrane lipids in the brain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.