Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36778332›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Optimizing the design of spatial genomic studies.

Andrew Jones, Diana Cai, Didong Li, Barbara E Engelhardt

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew JonesDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University.
Diana CaiDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University.
Didong LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Barbara E EngelhardtGladstone Institutes.
Princeton University · USGladstone Institutes · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
The Cellular Geography of Therapeutic Resistance in CancerU2CCA233195 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI VAN ALLEN, ELIEZER M · 2018 to 2023
$13.7M
NCI NIH HHS U2C CA233195NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatially-resolved genomic technologies have shown promise for studying the relationship between the structural arrangement of cells and their functional behavior. While numerous sequencing and imaging platforms exist for performing spatial transcriptomics and spatial proteomics profiling, these experiments remain expensive and labor-intensive. Thus, when performing spatial genomics experiments using multiple tissue slices, there is a need to select the tissue cross sections that will be maximally informative for the purposes of the experiment. In this work, we formalize the problem of experimental design for spatial genomics experiments, which we generalize into a problem class that we call

Identifiers

PMID36778332
PMCPMC9915499
OpenAlexW4318679797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.