Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36778001›Full record

ArticleCell genomics2022

A practical guideline of genomics-driven drug discovery in the era of global biobank meta-analysis.

Shinichi Namba, Takahiro Konuma, Kuan-Han Wu, Wei Zhou, Global Biobank Meta-analysis Initiative, Yukinori Okada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Leveraging the genetics of psychiatric disorders to prioritize potential drug targets and compounds.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Science advances · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shinichi NambaDepartment of Statistical Genetics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Takahiro KonumaDepartment of Statistical Genetics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Kuan-Han WuDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Wei ZhouAnalytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Global Biobank Meta-analysis Initiative
Yukinori OkadaDepartment of Statistical Genetics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita 565-0871, Japan.

Funding

Partners Healthcare Training Program in Precision and Genomic MedicineT32HG010464 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HEIDI L REHM, JORDAN W SMOLLER · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG010464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomics-driven drug discovery is indispensable for accelerating the development of novel therapeutic targets. However, the drug discovery framework based on evidence from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) has not been established, especially for cross-population GWAS meta-analysis. Here, we introduce a practical guideline for genomics-driven drug discovery for cross-population meta-analysis, as lessons from the Global Biobank Meta-analysis Initiative (GBMI). Our drug discovery framework encompassed three methodologies and was applied to the 13 common diseases targeted by GBMI (

Indexed as

cross-population meta-analysisgene prioritizationgenetically regulated gene expressiongenome-wide association studygenomics-driven drug discoveryMendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID36778001
PMCPMC9903693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.