ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Investigation and influence analysis of motor development in preterm infants.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prenatal exposures to organophosphate ester metabolites and early motor development in the MADRES cohort.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2024Article
- Predicting Age of Independent Walking in Preterm Infants: A Longitudinal Study Using Neonatal Characteristics and Motor Development Variables.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study early motor development in preterm infants, analyze related factors causing motor development delay, and provide evidence for early motor intervention.
methodsIn this retrospective analysis, the clinical data of 80 preterm infants who were registered in Pingxiang Maternity and Child Care from January 2021 to December 2021 were analyzed. Preterm infants' ages were corrected for month of age and their gross motor development was assessed by the AIMS motor scale. AIMS exercise scale was used to correct the motor development of 1-month-old premature infants. The preterm infants were divided into a normal motor development group (n = 63) and an abnormal motor development group (n = 17) according to their motor development. Sixty-three full-term infants with normal motor development registered in the hospital during the same period were selected as a control group to observe the differences between preterm infants with normal motor development and full-term infants. Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing gross motor retardation in preterm infants.
resultsAmong the 80 preterm infants, sixty-three (78.75%) had Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) > P
conclusionThe early motor development status of preterm infants is generally good. The height, weight, and head circumeferance at the corrected age of 1 month, and female sex were protective factors for motor development delay in preterm infants. Multiple pregnancy was a risk factor. Attention should be paid to premature boys with slow weight gain, and early detection and intervention for motor retardation in preterm infants should be given.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36777832PMC9908484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.