ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Re-catheterization in a young patient with acute myocardial infarction: is it preventable?
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking the Cardioprotective Action of Human Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Review of the Current Documents.Health science reports · 2026Article
- DynamX Bioadaptor as an Emerging and Promising Innovation in Interventional Cardiology.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Patient-Related Factors Predicting Stent Thrombosis in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The goal of our study was to determine the causes of re-catheterization in a young population who were admitted with myocardial infarction and previously underwent cardiac catheterization, and determine what measures can be applied to prevent their re-catheterization. A retrospective study was conducted at Tawam hospital for 6 years (2009-2014). 50 patients between 18 and 50 years of age admitted with acute coronary syndrome who had re-catheterization within a year from their first cardiac catheterization were included. Medical records were reviewed to gather demographic data, cardiac risk factors, laboratory data, hospital course, and angiographic findings. All data was analyzed using descriptive analysis. One third of study participants had been re-admitted electively for a staged PCI, while another third had been admitted and were found to have angina as they did not have significant lesions during re-catheterization; 12 of them had ballooning done while the remaining participants had no intervention. The final third of the participants had re-catheterization due to the development of a new infarction (STEMI/NSTEMI). Of those who had a new infarction, 14% had stent thromboses while 12% had stent restenosis. Stent thrombosis and stent restenosis were found to present as STEMI regardless of the diagnosis at first catheterization. Those with a bare metal stent were found to have a higher risk of ST/ISRS compared to those with a drug-eluting stent (DES). Among the cardiovascular risk factors, we determined that patients who had dyslipidemia (80%) presented the highest risk of having a re-catheterization, followed by those with hypertension or smoking (each 70%). No mortality was documented in the study population. Further research is warranted using accurate statistical analysis and a larger study population to determine the etiology and means of prevention of re-catheterization in the younger population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36777824PMC9908471What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.