Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777772›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Relationship between age and handgrip strength: Proposal of reference values from infancy to senescence.

Rossana Gómez-Campos, Rubén Vidal Espinoza, Miguel de Arruda, Enio Ricardo Vaz Ronque, Camilo Urra-Albornoz, Juan Carlos Minango, Fernando Alvear-Vasquez, Christian de la Torre Choque, Luis Felipe Castelli Correia de Campos, Jose Sulla Torres and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Blood-Based Lead Biomarkers and Sarcopenia Indicators in Older Adults.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rossana Gómez-CamposDepartamento de Diversidad e Inclusividad Educativa, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile.
Rubén Vidal EspinozaUniversidad Católica Silva Henriquez, Santiago, Chile.
Miguel de ArrudaUniversidad Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Enio Ricardo Vaz RonqueDepartamento de Educação Física (DEF), Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.
Camilo Urra-AlbornozEscuela de Ciencias del Deporte, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Santiago, Chile.
Juan Carlos MinangoInstituto Tecnológico Universitario Ruminahui, Sangolqui, Ecuador.
Fernando Alvear-VasquezFacultad de Educación, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, Chile.
Christian de la Torre ChoqueUniversidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.
Luis Felipe Castelli Correia de CamposDepartamento de Ciencias de la Educación, Facultad de Educación y Humanidades, Universidad del Bio-Bio, Chillán, Chile.
Jose Sulla TorresUniversidad Católica de Santa María, Arequipa, Perú.
Marco Cossio-BolañosFaculty of Education, Psychology and Sport Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Measurement of hand grip strength (HGS) has been proposed as a key component of frailty and has also been suggested as a central biomarker of healthy aging and a powerful predictor of future morbidity and mortality. Objectives: (a) To determine whether a nonlinear relationship model could improve the prediction of handgrip strength (HGS) compared to the linear model and (b) to propose percentiles to evaluate HGS according to age and sex for a regional population of Chile from infancy to senescence. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was developed in a representative sample of the Maule region (Chile). The volunteers amounted to 5,376 participants (2,840 men and 2,536 women), with an age range from 6 to 80 years old. Weight, height, HGS (right and left hand) according to age and sex were evaluated. Percentiles were calculated using the LMS method [(L (Lambda; asymmetry), M (Mu; median), and S (Sigma; coefficient of variation)]. Results and discussion: There were no differences in HGS from 6 to 11 years of age in both sexes; however, from 12 years of age onwards, males presented higher HGS values in both hands (

Indexed as

Hand StrengthVolunteersAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChileCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesYoung Adultdynamometerhand grip strengthinfancypercentilessenescence

Identifiers

PMID36777772
PMCPMC9909206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.