ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602020
Assessing Clinical Disease Recurrence Using Laboratory Data in Surgically Resected Patients From the TOPPIC Trial.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology: Towards Explainable, Generalisable and Clinically Actionable Decision Support.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence use for precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.American journal of translational research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Machine learning methodologies play an important role in predicting progression of disease or responses to medical therapy. We previously derived and validated a machine learning algorithm to predict response to thiopurines in an inflammatory bowel disease population. We aimed to apply a modified algorithm to predict postsurgical treatment response using clinical trial data. Methods: TOPPIC was a multicenter randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial of 240 patients, evaluating the effectiveness of 6-mercaptopurine in preventing or delaying postsurgical Crohn disease recurrence. We adapted a well-established machine learning algorithm to predict clinical recurrence postresection using age and multiple laboratory-specific covariates, and compared this to the thiopurine metabolite, 6-thioguanine. Results: The random forest machine learning algorithm demonstrates a mean under the receiver operator curve (AuROC) of 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47, 0.78]. Similar results were evident when adding thiopurine metabolite (6-thioguanine) results. Alanine aminotransferase/mean corpuscular volume (ALT/MCV) and potassium × alkaline phosphatase (POT × ALK) predicted endoscopic and biologic recurrence, respectively, with AuROCs of 0.714 (95% CI 0.601, 0.827) and 0.730 (95% CI 0.618, 0.841). Conclusions: A machine learning algorithm with laboratory data from within the first 3 months postsurgically does not discriminate clinical recurrence well. Alternative noninvasive measures should be considered and further evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.