Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777713›Full record

ArticleCell genomics2021

Population genomics of the critically endangered kākāpō.

Nicolas Dussex, Tom van der Valk, Hernán E Morales, Christopher W Wheat, David Díez-Del-Molino, Johanna von Seth, Yasmin Foster, Verena E Kutschera, Katerina Guschanski, Arang Rhie and 30 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Nicolas DussexCentre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Tom van der ValkCentre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Hernán E MoralesSection for Evolutionary Genomics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christopher W WheatDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
David Díez-Del-MolinoCentre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Johanna von SethCentre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Yasmin FosterDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Verena E KutscheraDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Box 1031, 17121 Solna, Sweden.
Katerina GuschanskiInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Arang RhieGenome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Adam M PhillippyGenome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Jonas KorlachPacific Biosciences, 1305 O'Brien Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Kerstin HoweWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK.
William ChowWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK.
Sarah PelanWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK.
Joanna D Mendes DamasDepartment of Evolution and Ecology and the UC Davis Genome Center, 4321 Genome and Biomedical Sciences Facility, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Harris A LewinDepartment of Evolution and Ecology and the UC Davis Genome Center, 4321 Genome and Biomedical Sciences Facility, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Alex R HastieBionano Genomics, 9540 Towne Centre Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Giulio FormentiVertebrate Genome Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Olivier FedrigoVertebrate Genome Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Joseph GuhlinGenomics Aotearoa and Laboratory for Evolution and Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Thomas W R HarropGenomics Aotearoa and Laboratory for Evolution and Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Marissa F Le LecGenomics Aotearoa and Laboratory for Evolution and Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Peter K DeardenGenomics Aotearoa and Laboratory for Evolution and Development, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Leanne HaggertyEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK.
Fergal J MartinEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK.
Vamsi KodaliNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Françoise Thibaud-NissenNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
David IornsThe Genetic Rescue Foundation, Wellington, New Zealand.
Michael KnappDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Neil J GemmellDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Fiona RobertsonDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Ron MoorhouseKākāpō Recovery, Department of Conservation, PO Box 743, Invercargill 9840, New Zealand.
Andrew DigbyKākāpō Recovery, Department of Conservation, PO Box 743, Invercargill 9840, New Zealand.
Daryl EasonKākāpō Recovery, Department of Conservation, PO Box 743, Invercargill 9840, New Zealand.
Deidre VercoeKākāpō Recovery, Department of Conservation, PO Box 743, Invercargill 9840, New Zealand.
Jason HowardVertebrate Genome Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Erich D JarvisVertebrate Genome Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Bruce C RobertsonDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Love DalénCentre for Palaeogenetics, Svante Arrhenius väg 20C, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kākāpō is a flightless parrot endemic to New Zealand. Once common in the archipelago, only 201 individuals remain today, most of them descending from an isolated island population. We report the first genome-wide analyses of the species, including a high-quality genome assembly for kākāpō, one of the first chromosome-level reference genomes sequenced by the Vertebrate Genomes Project (VGP). We also sequenced and analyzed 35 modern genomes from the sole surviving island population and 14 genomes from the extinct mainland population. While theory suggests that such a small population is likely to have accumulated deleterious mutations through genetic drift, our analyses on the impact of the long-term small population size in kākāpō indicate that present-day island kākāpō have a reduced number of harmful mutations compared to mainland individuals. We hypothesize that this reduced mutational load is due to the island population having been subjected to a combination of genetic drift and purging of deleterious mutations, through increased inbreeding and purifying selection, since its isolation from the mainland ∼10,000 years ago. Our results provide evidence that small populations can survive even when isolated for hundreds of generations. This work provides key insights into kākāpō breeding and recovery and more generally into the application of genetic tools in conservation efforts for endangered species.

Indexed as

bottleneckconservationinbreedingkākāpōmutational loadpurging

Identifiers

PMID36777713
PMCPMC9903828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.