Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777668›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Jianyong Liang, Tiecheng Wu, Tao Wang, Yuejun Ma, Yurong Li, Shengguo Zhao, Yanli Guo, Bin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jianyong LiangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Tiecheng WuInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Tao WangInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Yuejun MaInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Yurong LiInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Shengguo ZhaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Yanli GuoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China.
Bin LiuInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial insemination (AI) is an effective reproductive technique to improve the performance of cashmere goats and prevent the spread of diseases, and the quality of the semen determines the success of AI. The potential of Results: Results showed that MOLE contained long-chain fatty acids and flavonoids. Treatment with MOLP and MOLE increased the activities of the serum catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase ( Conclusions: Oral MOLE supplementation can improve semen quality by increasing the antioxidant capacity and altering the rumen microbiota and metabolites of cashmere goats. Moreover, the MOLP supplementation could enhance the antioxidant capacity of cashmere goats.

Indexed as

antioxidantcashmere goatmetabolomemicrobiomeMoringa oleifera leaf extractpolyunsaturated fatty acidsemen quality

Identifiers

PMID36777668
PMCPMC9911920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.