Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777659›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2022

Use of geospatial analysis for priority setting in surgical system investment in Guatemala.

Alexandra M Buda, Paul Truche, Erick Izquierdo, Sandra de Izquierdo, Sabrina Asturias, Makela Stankey, Kee B Park, Gregory Peck, Sabrina Juran, Faye M Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexandra M BudaProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Paul TrucheProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Erick IzquierdoMinistry of Public Health and Social Assistance, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Sandra de IzquierdoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Herrera Llerandi Hospital, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Sabrina AsturiasDepartment of Surgery, Roosevelt Hospital, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Makela StankeyProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kee B ParkProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gregory PeckRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Sabrina JuranProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Faye M EvansProgram in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Two-hour and 30 min travel times to a hospital capable of performing emergency general surgery and cesarean section are benchmarks for timely surgical access. This study aimed to estimate the population of Guatemala with timely access to surgical care and identify existing hospitals where the expansion of surgical services would increase access. Methods: The World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WFSA) Anesthesia Facility Assessment Tool (AFAT) previously identified 37 public Guatemalan hospitals that provide surgical care. Nine additional public non-surgical hospitals were also identified. Geospatial analysis was performed to estimate walking and driving geographic access to all 46 hospitals. We calculated the potential increase in access that would accompany the expansion of surgical services at each of the nine non-surgical hospitals. Findings: The percentage of the population with walking access to a surgical hospital within 30 min, 1 h, and 2 h are 5·1%, 12·9%, and 27·3%, respectively. The percentage of people within 30 min, 1 h, and 2 h driving times are 27·3%, 41·1%, and 53·1%, respectively. The median percentage of the population within each of Guatemala's 22 administrative departments with 2 h walking access was 19·0% [IQR 14·1-30·7] and 2 h driving access was 52·4% [IQR 30·5-62·8]. Expansion of surgical care at existing public Guatemalan hospitals in Guatemala would result in a minimal increase in overall geographic access compared to current availability. Interpretation: While Guatemala provides universal health coverage, geographic access to surgical care remains inadequate. Geospatial mapping and survey data work synergistically to assess surgical system strength and identify gaps in geographic access to essential surgical care. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Geospatial analysisGlobal surgeryGuatemalaSurgical health systemsSurgical indicators

Identifiers

PMID36777659
PMCPMC9904083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.