Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777592›Full record

ReviewACS omega2023

Carbon Nanostructure Embedded Novel Sensor Implementation for Detection of Aromatic Volatile Organic Compounds: An Organized Review.

Nibedita Nath, Anupam Kumar, Subhendu Chakroborty, Siba Soren, Arundhati Barik, Kaushik Pal, Fernando Gomes de Souza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Radon Exposure Assessment: IoT-Embedded Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nibedita NathDepartment of Chemistry, D.S. Degree College, Laida, Sambalpur, Odisha 768214, India.
Anupam KumarElectrical and Electronics Engineering Department, IES College of Technology, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462044, India.
Subhendu ChakrobortyDepartment of Basic Sciences, IITM, IES University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462044, India.
Siba SorenDepartment of Chemistry, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha 753003, India.
Arundhati BarikRama Devi Women's University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751007, India.
Kaushik PalUniversity Centre for Research and Development (UCRD), Department of Physics, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Gharuan, Punjab 140413, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9313-6497
Fernando Gomes de SouzaInstituto de Macromoléculas Professora Eloisa Mano, Centro de Tecnologia-Cidade Universitária, Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-617, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For field-like environmental gas monitoring and noninvasive illness diagnostics, effective sensing materials with exceptional sensing capabilities of sensitive, quick detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are required. Carbon-based nanomaterials (CNMs), like CNTs, graphene, carbon dots (Cdots), and others, have recently drawn a lot of interest for their future application as an elevated-performance sensor for the detection of VOCs. CNMs have a greater potential for developing selective sensors that target VOCs due to their tunable chemical and surface properties. Additionally, the mechanical versatility of CNMs enables the development of novel gas sensors and places them ahead of other sensing materials for wearable applications. An overview of the latest advancements in the study of CNM-based sensors is given in this comprehensive organized review.

Identifiers

PMID36777592
PMCPMC9909795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.