ArticleACS omega2023
Numerical Simulation on the Hydrogen Storage Performance of Magnesium Hydrogen Storage Reactors.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thermal Management in Metal Hydride Hydrogen Storage Reactors: Mechanisms, Architectures, and Design Trade-Offs.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnesium hydride (MH) is one of the most promising hydrogen storage materials. Under the hydrogen storage process, it will emit a large amount of heat, which limits the efficiency of the hydrogen storage reaction. In this paper, the hydrogen storage performance of the magnesium hydrogen storage reactor (MHSR) and the effect of structural parameters were studied by numerical simulation. The effect of different operating conditions on the hydrogen storage performance of the MHSR is analyzed. The volume energy storage rate (VESR) was taken as the comprehensive evaluation index (CEI). The results show that fins and heat exchange tubes can improve the heat transfer performance of the MHSR. Increasing fin thickness can reduce hydrogen storage time, but increasing fin spacing is the opposite. With the increase of fin thickness and fin spacing, VESR increases first and then decreases. With the increase of inlet temperature, the hydrogen storage time decreases first and then increases. When the inlet velocity is more than 5 m/s, the hydrogen storage time basically stays at 900 s. By optimizing the operating conditions, the hydrogen storage time can be shortened by 57.8%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.