ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2023
Using nomogram, decision tree, and deep learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with early gastric cancer: a multi-cohort study.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Non-invasive prediction of occult peritoneal metastasis (OPM) in gastric cancer using logistic regression and random forest integrative models with CT radiomics and clinical parameters: machine learning prediction of gastric OPM.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- A nomogram for predicting non-curative resection in patients with early gastric cancer based on white light imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Current Concepts, Pitfalls and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- An ensemble learning model to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The application of artificial intelligence in upper gastrointestinal cancers.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Review
- Combining biomarkers to construct a novel predictive model for predicting preoperative lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Screening of gastric cancer diagnostic biomarkers in the homologous recombination signaling pathway and assessment of their clinical and radiomic correlations.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Comparative assessment of the capability of machine learning-based radiomic models for predicting omental metastasis in locally advanced gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Correlation between postoperative chemotherapy regimen and survival in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma accompanied with vascular cancer thrombus.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in a Western Series of Patients with Distal Early Gastric Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Cancer Research: A Comprehensive Guide.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate assessment of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with early gastric cancer is critical to the selection of the most appropriate surgical treatment. This study aims to develop an optimal LNM prediction model using different methods, including nomogram, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and deep learning methods. In this study, we included two independent datasets: the gastrectomy set (n=3158) and the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) set (n=323). The nomogram, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and fully convolutional neural networks (FCNN) models were established based on logistic regression analysis of the development set. The predictive power of the LNM prediction models was revealed by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots. We then used the ESD set as an external cohort to evaluate the models' performance. In the gastrectomy set, multivariate analysis showed that gender (P=0.008), year when diagnosed (2006-2010 year, P=0.265; 2011-2015 year, P=0.001; and 2016-2020 year, P<0.001, respectively), tumor size (2-4 cm, P=0.001; and ≥4 cm, P<0.001, respectively), tumor grade (poorly-moderately, P=0.016; moderately, P<0.001; well-moderately, P<0.001; and well, P<0.001, respectively), vascular invasion (P<0.001), and pT stage (P<0.001) were independent risk factors for LNM in early gastric cancer. The area under the curve (AUC) for the validation set using the nomogram, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and FCNN models were 0.78, 0.76, 0.77, and 0.79, respectively. In conclusion, our multi-cohort study systematically investigated different LNM prediction methods for patients with early gastric cancer. These models were validated and shown to be reliable with AUC>0.76 for all. Specifically, the FCNN model showed the most accurate prediction of LNM risks in early gastric cancer patients with AUC=0.79. Based on the FCNN model, patients with LNM rates of >4.77% are strong candidates for gastrectomy rather than ESD surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36777507PMC9906085What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.