Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777485›Full record

ArticleBlockchain in healthcare today2021

Jan Witowski, Jongmun Choi, Soomin Jeon, Doyun Kim, Joowon Chung, John Conklin, Maria Gabriela Figueiro Longo, Marc D Succi, Synho Do

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blockchain in healthcare today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan WitowskiLaboratory of Medical Imaging and Computation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jongmun ChoiLaboratory of Medical Imaging and Computation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Soomin JeonLaboratory of Medical Imaging and Computation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Doyun KimLaboratory of Medical Imaging and Computation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Joowon ChungLaboratory of Medical Imaging and Computation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
John ConklinDivision of Emergency Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Maria Gabriela Figueiro LongoDivision of Emergency Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Marc D SucciMedically Engineered Solutions in Healthcare (MESH) Incubator, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Synho DoLaboratory of Medical Imaging and Computation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6211-7050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current research on medical image processing relies heavily on the amount and quality of input data. Specifically, supervised machine learning methods require well-annotated datasets. A lack of annotation tools limits the potential to achieve high-volume processing and scaled systems with a proper reward mechanism. We developed MarkIt, a web-based tool, for collaborative annotation of medical imaging data with artificial intelligence and blockchain technologies. Our platform handles both Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) and non-DICOM images, and allows users to annotate them for classification and object detection tasks in an efficient manner. MarkIt can accelerate the annotation process and keep track of user activities to calculate a fair reward. A proof-of-concept experiment was conducted with three fellowship-trained radiologists, each of whom annotated 1,000 chest X-ray studies for multi-label classification. We calculated the inter-rater agreement and estimated the value of the dataset to distribute the reward for annotators using a crypto currency. We hypothesize that MarkIt allows the typically arduous annotation task to become more efficient. In addition, MarkIt can serve as a platform to evaluate the value of data and trade the annotation results in a more scalable manner in the future. The platform is publicly available for testing on

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceblockchaindata annotationlearning from crowdsrewarding system

Identifiers

PMID36777485
PMCPMC9907418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.