ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602023
Safety and Effectiveness of Ustekinumab for Crohn's Disease in Japanese Post-marketing Surveillance in Biologic-Naive and -Experienced Conriemed.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term drug persistence and clinical outcomes of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease: a multicenter real-world study from the Hokkaido phoenix cohort.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- Persistence of advanced therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: retrospective cohort study using a large healthcare claims database in Japan.Intestinal research · 2025Article
- One-year Safety and Effectiveness of Ustekinumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease: The K-STAR Study.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of Ustekinumab for Crohn's Disease With Perianal Manifestations: Ad hoc Analysis Data From 1-Year Post-Marketing Surveillance Study in Japan.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2024Article
- Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel diseases.Intestinal research · 2024Review
- Long-term real-world data of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease: the Stockholm ustekinumab study.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To present the real-world evidence on the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) through 52-week treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) under an analysis of post-market surveillance data in Japan. Methods: This prospective, post-marketing surveillance study was conducted in 341 patients from 91 medical facilities in Japan. Patients received UST 90 mg injected subcutaneously once every 12 weeks (or every 8 weeks if patients show weak effectiveness) after an induction dose given intravenously. Clinical response (100-point decrease in Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score), clinical remission (CDAI score of <150), steroid-free clinical remission, C-reactive protein, endoscopy, physician global assessment, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were evaluated through 52 weeks. Results: The overall rate of clinical remission was 49.2% at week 8 and 56.0% at week 52. The rate of clinical remission in biologic-naive patients was 75.9% and 66.7% at weeks 8 and 52, respectively, whereas the rate in biologic-experienced patients was 41.4% and 52.6% at weeks 8 and 52, respectively. For 52 weeks, the overall incidence of ADRs and serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) was 11.7% and 6.7%, respectively. The most frequently reported SADRs was worsening of CD (1.8%). In multivariate analysis, ADRs incidence was significantly lower in patients with ileal involvement of CD (odds ratio = 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.85, Conclusions: The present study identified no new safety concerns and effectiveness for CD in Japanese patients treated with UST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.