Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777363›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2023

Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in bio-naïve Crohn's disease patients: a multicentre observational retrospective study.

Valdés Delgado Teresa, Olmedo Martín Rául, Iborra Marisa, Herrera de Guisé Claudia, Fuentes-Valenzuela Esteban, Melcarne Luigi, Martín-Rodríguez Mª Mar, Kolle Casso Lilyan, De Castro Parga Luisa, Ponferrada Díaz Ángel and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Valdés Delgado TeresaGastroenterology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Av. Dr. Fedriani s/n, Seville 41009, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2142-5142
Olmedo Martín RáulRegional University Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Iborra MarisaLa Fe University and Politechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Herrera de Guisé ClaudiaVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Fuentes-Valenzuela EstebanRío Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
Melcarne LuigiPark Taulí University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Martín-Rodríguez Mª MarVirgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Kolle Casso LilyanGeneral Hospital of La Palma, Santa Cruz de La Palma, Spain.
De Castro Parga LuisaÁlvaro Cunqueiro Hospital, Vigo, Spain.
Ponferrada Díaz ÁngelInfanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Vicente Lidón RaquelMiguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Manceñido Marcos NoemíInfanta Sofia University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Velayos Jiménez BenitoValladolid University Clinical Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
Lázaro Sáez MartaTorrecárdenas University Hospital, Almería, Spain.
López Cauce BeatrizGregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Mesonero Gismero FranciscoRamón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Gilabert Álvarez PauViladecans Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Argüelles-Arias FedericoVirgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease (CD). However, more data are necessary on the effectiveness of ustekinumab in bio-naïve patients in real-life studies. Objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with CD refractory or intolerant to conventional therapy and without previous exposure to biological drugs. Design: We performed a nationwide, observational, retrospective, multicentre study including patients with CD, in which ustekinumab was used as the first biological drug. Methods: The corticosteroid-free clinical and biological response and remission were analysed at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72. Clinical remission was defined as Harvey-Bradshaw index ⩽ 4 and biological remission as a faecal calprotectin (FC) <250 mg/g and C-reactive protein (CRP) <5 mg/L. Moreover, the persistence of the treatment and any adverse events were assessed. Results: In all, 84 patients were included in the study, males and females were equally distributed, with a median age of 63 years [interquartile range (IQR): 51-75] and a median disease duration of 6.8 years [IQR: 3.6-17.0]. The majority (86.9%) of patients were treated with ustekinumab as monotherapy, without concomitant immunosuppressive medication. The proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical remission or response at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72 was 93.3% (56/60), 86.8% (46/53), 82.2% (37/45) and 71.4% (30/42), respectively. CRP returned to normal values in 47.6%, 43.2%, 50% and 52.4% of patients at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72, respectively. Similarly, FC was normalized in 45.5%, 45.5%, 48.6% and 50% of patients at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72, respectively. The cumulative probability of remaining on ustekinumab treatment was 84.8% (95% confidence interval: 73.3-91.6) after 72 weeks. Ustekinumab was discontinued in 10 patients (11.9%) within 72 weeks of follow-up. Reasons for discontinuing treatment were lack of response ( Conclusions: Ustekinumab was effective and safe in Spanish bio-naïve CD patients, showing a quicker and more durable response than obtained in patients with previous biological treatment. In this cohort of bio-naïve patients starting on ustekinumab, the average age was high. Plain language summary:

Indexed as

biological therapybio-naïveCrohn’s diseaseeffectivenessustekinumab

Identifiers

PMID36777363
PMCPMC9912551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.