Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777325›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2022

Assessment of U.S. heart transplantation equity as a function of race: Observational analyses of the OPTN database.

Rebecca Cogswell, Maria Masotti, Alanna A Morris, Allyson Hart, Tom Murray, Clyde Yancy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The association of place-based disadvantage and access to deceased donor heart transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  4. Access to early liver transplantation is adversely impacted by social determinants of health: A retrospective cohort study.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Unequal Hearts: Racial Disparities Persist in Heart Transplant Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca CogswellDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Maria MasottiUniversity of Minnesota School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Alanna A MorrisDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Allyson HartDivision of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Tom MurrayUniversity of Minnesota School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Clyde YancyProfessor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Racial disparities in heart transplantation (HT) outcomes are suspected but uncertain. The additional impact of a recent change in donor allocation on disparities in HT in the United States (US) is unknown. We hypothesize racial disparities in HT are present and may be worsened by new allocation practices. Methods: Cohort: Adults listed for HT before and after a heart allocation policy change (Era 1: Oct 18 Results: Of 17,384 waitlist candidates (Era 1: 9,150, Era 2: 8,234), Black waitlist candidates had a lower rate of HT compared to White waitlist candidates in Era 1 (adjusted HR 0·90, 95 % CI 0·84-0·97, p = 0·0053) and in Era 2 (adjusted HR 0·81, 95 % CI 0·75-0·88, p <0·0001, era race interaction p=0·056). The rate of waitlist removal for death or deterioration was similar between races in Era 1 (adjusted HR 0·92, 95 % 0·77-1·1, p = 0·38), but increased for Black candidates in Era 2 (adjusted HR 1·34, 95 % CI 1·09-1·65, p = 0·0054, era race interaction p = 0·0051). Interpretation: Both the measured rate of transplantation and rate of delisting for death or clinical deterioration have worsened for Black compared to White waitlist candidates under the new allocation system. Causes for these disparities require further study. Funding: University of Minnesota Department of Cardiology funds.

Indexed as

BMI, body mass indexDisparitiesHeart TransplantationHT, Heart transplantationLVAD, Left ventricular assist deviceMCS, Mechanical Circulatory SupportOPTN, Organ Procurement and Transplantation NetworkSDOH, social determinants of healthSES, socioeconomic statusSRTR, Scientific Registry of Transplant RecipientSVI, social vulnerability index

Identifiers

PMID36777325
PMCPMC9903948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.