Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777165›Full record

ReviewJACC. Basic to translational science2023

Neprilysin Inhibitors in Heart Failure: The Science, Mechanism of Action, Clinical Studies, and Unanswered Questions.

Biykem Bozkurt, Ajith P Nair, Arunima Misra, Claire Z Scott, Jamal H Mahar, Savitri Fedson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. Basic to translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cardiac fibrosis: from mechanisms and models to medicines.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Biykem BozkurtWinters Center for Heart Failure Research, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston Texas, USA.
Ajith P NairCardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Arunima MisraCardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Claire Z ScottCardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jamal H MaharCardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Savitri FedsonCardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides a contemporary review and a new perspective on the role of neprilysin inhibition in heart failure (HF) in the context of recent clinical trials and addresses potential mechanisms and unanswered questions in certain HF patient populations. Neprilysin is an endopeptidase that cleaves a variety of peptides such as natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, adrenomedullin, substance P, angiotensin I and II, and endothelin. It has a broad role in cardiovascular, renal, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and neurologic functions. The combined angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) has been developed with an intent to increase vasodilatory natriuretic peptides and prevent counterregulatory activation of the angiotensin system. ARNi therapy is very effective in reducing the risks of death and hospitalization for HF in patients with HF and New York Heart Association functional class II to III symptoms, but studies failed to show any benefits with ARNi when compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with advanced HF with reduced ejection fraction or in patients following myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction but without HF. These raise the questions about whether the enzymatic breakdown of natriuretic peptides may not be a very effective solution in advanced HF patients when there is downstream blunting of the response to natriuretic peptides or among post-myocardial infarction patients in the absence of HF when there may not be a need for increased natriuretic peptide availability. Furthermore, there is a need for additional studies to determine the long-term effects of ARNi on albuminuria, obesity, glycemic control and lipid profile, blood pressure, and cognitive function in patients with HF.

Indexed as

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzymeangiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitorANP, atrial natriuretic peptideARB, angiotensin receptor blockerARN, angiotensin receptor–neprilysinARNiAβ, amyloid betaBNP, brain natriuretic peptideBP, blood pressurecGMP, cyclic guanosine monophosphateCSF, cerebrospinal fluidEF, ejection fractioneGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rateFDA, U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationGFR, glomerular filtration rateheart failureHF, heart failureHFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fractionHFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fractionLVEF, left ventricular ejection fractionLV, left ventricularMI, myocardial infarctionNEP inhibitorneprilysinneprilysin inhibitorNT-proBNP, N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptideNYHA, New York Heart AssociationPDE, phosphodiesteraseRAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systemsacubitrilsacubitril/valsartanUACR, urinary albumin/creatine ratio

Identifiers

PMID36777165
PMCPMC9911324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.