Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777136›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2023

Kinematic scattering by nanocrystals.

Olivier Thomas, Ismail Cevdet Noyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Journal of applied crystallography · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olivier ThomasAix Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CNRS, IM2NP, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0583-9257
Ismail Cevdet NoyanApplied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various formulations are compared which describe diffraction from ultra-thin single-crystal films in the symmetric scattering configuration, showing that, for this thickness range, several implicit assumptions in these formulations are no longer satisfied. Consequently, the position, integrated intensity and integral breadth of a diffraction peak cannot be related to the lattice spacing of the material or the number of unit cells along the diffraction vector using traditional analysis methods. Some simple equations are proposed to obtain the correct values of these parameters for this specific sample/diffraction geometry combination. More generally, the development of rigorous formalisms for analyzing diffraction from nanocrystals is proposed.

Indexed as

kinematic scatteringnanocrystalsX-ray diffraction

Identifiers

PMID36777136
PMCPMC9901918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.